Its actually more nuanced dynamic in my opinion and i think you are right mate - a decision needs to be made on Dom in the hierarchy.
Its like this for me, strikers are the most sought after, expensive and one of the most limited skill sets in playing pools in the market. To get a good one you have to invest big but you also have to attract them - very few clubs bar the really massive ones can hold two top top strikers - in attracting them - you genreally have to assure them that they are the alpha. A very good striker isnt going to come to a club where there is an existing Alpha - for example Spurs have struggled for years to have a back up at 9 for Kane and have had to rely on wide forwards.
The dilema for us - is we have an Alpha in Dom, but hes not reliable. We need a striker and the one we need will need big investment, big wages and be convinced that they will be the alpha, elsewise you are shopping in the potential market punting or the Maupay market. Thats a big decision for the club in terms investment.
So we are either, dropping Dom down the hierarchy and he becomes the Beta and bringing in a new Alpha or we keep Dom as Alpha and are punting on potential with risk or getting something out of the Kone, Rondon, Maupay market. Alternatively, we buy wide hybrid forwards like Richarlision, but you feel like we need a 9.
Its a big call by the club.