Disagree.. I think choosing the right manager was far more important than Kings Dock.
Kings Dock with a poor manager could easily of equalled relegation.
No Kings dock with the right managers has seen us rise back up to a formidable force just without a new stadium.
I think people overestimate the impact a new stadium has on the fortunes of a club tbh.
It was a massive error but in no way makes the progress we have made pale into insignificance.
Stadiums don't equal improvement, good managers do, stadiums just add financial backing to make things for those managers a little easier:
Sunderland have done f..all despite their Stadium of light
The Britannia doesn't send much time hosting champions league games either for example.
The Reebok, Falmer Stadium, better still..
..How about Cardiff who have had both investment and a new stadium and found themselves having been in the premiership, but are back down a division despite having both things we didn't.
Sorry, I agree it was a big black mark in the clubs history, but I just don't buy it, a new stadium is a supplementary addition with some financial benefits that take years to pay off. Its not a quick fix, make everything better scenario people often portray. Its certainly not as important as the quality of the manager for me.