My personal opinion is that Balls is incompetent and dangerous.
I say give him the whelk store first.He couldn't run a whelk stall never mind an economy.......
No, I am saying it is not an objective piece of journalism. The author has as much a political agenda as I may have, arguably a greater one.
Hence my initial comment about objectivity.
I say give him the whelk store first.
It doesn't need to be an objective piece of journalism to contain factual information that is valid and relevant.
Yes Gordon was an 'economic genius', thats right and therefore Balls is one too;
Ed Balls was the architect of Gordon Brown’s economic policies
Balls in.
So if it's a hung Parliament, who is labour likely to do a deal with and who is the conseversatives likely to do a deal with?
My personal opinion is that Balls is incompetent and dangerous, i haven't hidden this opinion.
This is getting ridiculous. I heavily criticise both Osborne and Balls and yet i'm accused of being pro Osbourne and that no one should be able to criticise him? My god.
I think Balls would be the worst chancellor out of the lot, i really do, i think he's completely out of his depth. Osbourne on the other hand i think is incredibly competent and incredibly smart. He knows exactly what he is doing
So if it's a hung Parliament, who is labour likely to do a deal with and who is the conseversatives likely to do a deal with?