daylightrobber
Player Valuation: £15m
You don't seem very sure.
You honestly don't know how to get the wealthy to pay their share?
They don't need to. Trickle down remember.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don't seem very sure.
You honestly don't know how to get the wealthy to pay their share?
If you compare our performance internationally, via the PISA tests, we actually do rather badly, and despite the huge investment in them during the Labour years, our standing didn't really change.
Giving teachers control over schools rather than bureaucrats has thus far shown to be a good thing (on the whole).
You don't seem very sure.
You honestly don't know how to get the wealthy to pay their share?
It's irrelevant what I think.
Again, what control can you measure it against, though? There are so many variables at work that international comparisons are only so useful. There is no doubt in my mind that British teachers are better trained than they've ever been (and are highly rated around the world). Do you think that Sri Lankan children are genetically predisposed to being good at maths, for example. In my experience, they are almost invariably noticably numerate. And yet they get taught by the same teachers as everyone else in the school. It seems obvious to me that there is something else at play here.
Hugely debatable. Teachers don't really want control over their own schools, they want to teach and they want practical support to that end. They want Head Teachers they can trust and Heads want a support sytem that helps their school to help their children be successful in life. I don't know one teacher who thinks ideological experiments with children's futures are a good thing but I suppose ethere must be some out there.
I'll say again - as sure as eggs is eggs, some free schools will be very good, some will be okay, and some will be un unmitigated disaster.
No, it isn't irrelevant to the question I asked you. I'm asking you if you think it's right. Go back and look at the question I asked, then answer it.
Do the Tories address these issues? Apart from fox hunting, which they love.
Why? So you can disagree with me again, or be outraged or something? What good would it do to anyone me sharing my thoughts on whether something is fair or not?
That'll be a 'yes' then.
Do you have a heart in there somewhere Bruce!?
I agree completely about the schools. Let them teach, and let someone who knows what they're doing run the school.Again, what control can you measure it against, though? There are so many variables at work that international comparisons are only so useful. There is no doubt in my mind that British teachers are better trained than they've ever been (and are highly rated around the world). Do you think that Sri Lankan children are genetically predisposed to being good at maths, for example. In my experience, they are almost invariably noticably numerate. And yet they get taught by the same teachers as everyone else in the school. It seems obvious to me that there is something else at play here.
Hugely debatable. Teachers don't really want control over their own schools, they want to teach and they want practical support to that end. They want Head Teachers they can trust and Heads want a support sytem that helps their school to help their children be successful in life. I don't know one teacher who thinks ideological experiments with children's futures are a good thing but I suppose ethere must be some out there.
I'll say again, though - as sure as eggs is eggs, some free schools will be very good, some will be okay, and some will be an unmitigated disaster.
Not my cup of either mate!
Why? So you can disagree with me again, or be outraged or something?
What good would it do to anyone me sharing my thoughts on whether something is fair or not?
In the longer term I'd say that's the only real weapon we have to ensure we do alright in the global economy. Everything rests on the knowledge we have. There's obviously much that can be done with that 8-3 window, but I don't know how everything else involved in learning can change, especially for the poorer folks.
How many times have you heard the line, "clean up the mess left by a Labour"? Say it enough and people believe it. Look, it suited the Tory party down to the ground that the global financial crisis came when it did. It suited them because they could directly blame the Labour Party for any financial uncertainty. Not only that, but it also meant that they could then begin to feed the nation the notion that there was only one viable alternative; austerity. It was a sequence of positives for the Tories and the only reason they managed to scrap into government even without an outright majority.
Ultimately, their cuts have been purely ideological and often devastating. To anyone who buys the Tory line of Labour crashing the economy, do some a bit of research and think; perhaps the Tory party are telling lies. It certainly wouldn't be the first time.
There's a great big elephant in the room here called the British class system and private education. Without a meritocratic society we are de facto under-reaching our massive potential. Genuine talent is being held back; mediocrity is being allowed to triumph (I mean, do you really think intellectual pygmies like Cameron and Osborne would be in charge if they'd not lived a life of privilege?). I'd have thought a libetarian would have been with me on this one.