I'm not saying we would get a favorable deal in the long term. We would make a deal that would suit both sides. In the meantime we would agree to continue albeit with no voice but given our limited voice that's not much of a concern.
It would neither be paradise or Armageddon. It just isn't a big reason to vote one way or the other.
So... if you say that there is nothing in it in terms of the economic argument (debatable) then what reasons are there? I know there are some - I just want to hear them from you.
I don't do incoherent. Sarcasm maybe. Which bits of our EU membership will we miss do you reckon. Which bits do you feel we will not be able to replicate or replace. How exactly will we suffer and which companies will do so.
Trade with the Eu consists of less than 10% of our economy. Why do you believe that the cost of membership and the diktats from Brussells in terms of regulation and laws are worth it.
What price would you put on having democratic control of your own country.......
Hm, if we accept even momentarily that 10% is a small enough amount to disregard (NER-NERRR...) :
You are presumably just talking about goods (half of UK exports go to the EU). I agree that mostly this would be mostly okay to renegotiate (if all that article 50 stuff goes through swimmingly, which isn't a given) for the auto-industry, likewise with aerospace and engineering etc.
But I believe there are a lot of long-term questions over FDI and manufacturing, which are subject to a lot more long-winded mechanisms than your arguments are giving any credit for. There will also be an initial period of great instability in all sectors.
Services - mainly, the current financial center of Europe in the Smog-tropolis - this is where our access looks to be restricted. Why don't you explain to me what possible reason the EU-27 would have to not try and restrict access to the market, and bring some of that lovin' into the euro area?
The EU needs reforming but we stand to lose a lot more than we stand to gain, and I believe the risk is being downplayed massively here. I think you overstate the clout that the UK has as a trading partner, and are not grasping the uncertainty surrounding the politics of this situation.
The racist card.....oh dear...... Other countries have trade arrangements with the Eu without having free movement arrangements......
...Yes, they do. They're the ones that aren't in the EU and are subject to tariffs? Do you understand that aspect of any potential bargain? I won't make reference to the British ex-pats abroad and the fantastic contributions they will make. Or the countless studies that overwhelmingly point to the fact that we get a net contribution from EU migrants, since you're likely entrenched in your thoughts on that one.