The Everton Board Thread 2014/15

Is it time for change?

  • I'm happy with the way thing are. Kenwright and the Board should stay.

  • Kenwright and the board need to go. We need change.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Apparently WBA for sale now for £150m (Sunday People). If true, what have they got we haven't? New or better ground! No. Bigger fan base? No. Located in London? No. Better squad? No. Better history/more trophies? No. These are the usual retorts when we ask question as to why a club is 'preferred' over us. None apply to West Brom, so I give up now. Just saying!

Someone who wants to sell?
 

The problem is defenders of the Board look at what they have done in absolute terms. Yes it's true that we're financially stable now and not at risk of having to sell our best players every year just to keep the banks from harassing us. This is good.

However, in a relative (to other PL teams) context, we have fallen far, far behind. All that TV money that we're getting, the other clubs are getting too. The board's complete inability to market the club and increase commercial revenue means that the moment our league position starts slipping (we're not finishing regularly top half/7th/8th/whatever) we'll be losing revenues relative to our competitors. Unless we can find Moyes-style bargains in the transfer market, which Martinez has not shown an aptitude for, I think this will lead to a gradual slide down the table and see us more in the position of Sunderland or Villa in the coming years. And if we are ever relegated, I don't have any faith that current ownership would act swiftly or decisively enough to correct it.

I don't doubt Kenwright's dedication to the club, but it's painfully obvious he has no idea how to run a club in the 21st century. Them lot might be the definition of mediocre for the last ten years, but they do know how to sell themselves and keep their stature, by shouting about how big they are at every opportunity. We laugh at them but it works - just look at their commercial income, transfer budgets, and wage bills. Perception is huge in the modern game. Martinez gets it - which is part of the reason why we announced the Lukaku fee at £28m, even though it's actually lower. If you constantly claim poverty the rest of the footballing world will treat you like a small club.
 

West Brom have got a reasonable price tag attached to them. With the current levels of TV money and the massive increase due in two years, there's no way this board will sell for under £200m
 
Another of the mysteries about this board is what plans it has at all for the club.

When you think back to the comic, amateur efforts with Samuelson, the Manchester Council tenant, the failed effort with that agent and other laughable episodes to flog part/all the club, then a sale must be in their plans.

But then other statements from our Dear Leader make you believe that he has no real intention to sell but just intends to sit back and complacently let things meander on.
 
Another of the mysteries about this board is what plans it has at all for the club.

When you think back to the comic, amateur efforts with Samuelson, the Manchester Council tenant, the failed effort with that agent and other laughable episodes to flog part/all the club, then a sale must be in their plans.

But then other statements from our Dear Leader make you believe that he has no real intention to sell but just intends to sit back and complacently let things meander on.
I think it is pretty clear in all seriousness.
Hope like hell the Liverpool Council and private investors get a new stadium built, then with a new stadium actually put the club up for sale, and fill their pockets and finally walk away.
Lets hope that new stadium is fitting of our great club. That is where my concern lies.
 

Aren't you all bored with this yet?





*I said bored so it's close to being on topic
Almost a cure for my insomnia
bob-zahn-i-m-getting-bored-mom-let-s-cut-to-the-chase-cartoon.webp
 
Do you have any idea what Mansour is doing for Manchester (and I dont mean the football club) to say you wouldnt want him at this club is absolutely certifiably crazy, he is providing an infrastructure for not just the club but for the whole community to thrive!!

At the totally opposite end of the spectrum we have Everton to have to rely on the local community and council to even have a shot at getting a new stadium and even now it looks unlikely.

Southhampton have spent nearly every penny they recouped in the summer and to say they had to sell is completely wrong. The daughter has said she has no intention of leaving and confirmed that by reinvesting the transfer fees they received in the summer.

Has the Board had significant failures?

KD, FSF, NTL, DK, Chris Samuelson, The park end, 2 training grounds sold, a man who lived in a 1 bed flat above a shop getting past due diligence.

Id also question why in a year of record revenue that debt has increased.

Also you have your last paragraph totally the wrong way round, with the current sky money and the increased deal coming in a couple of years then clubs will need the champions league less and less to survive financially. The league provides much more money than the champions league now.

What is Mansour doing exactly for Manchester? Does it change the fact that that football club is entirely at the mercy of his will and pocket? Does that make Man City one of the most financially risky clubs in England? No i absolutely would not want that for Everton, i think anyone who wants this high stakes roulette to continue in football is certifiable. We are going to end up with every club owned by a billionaire throughout Europe wanting to form a European super league with a cup comp to go alongside it. You give me the choice of the Man City business model and finances or the Arsenal one and i go for Arsenal every time and twice on Sundays. One is built on the building of solid financial assets and resources working to provide significantly higher revenue than most other clubs and the other is built on middle east sand. Thats my opinion. Arsenal are the best run club in the country by an absolute mile off the pitch and they can compete with top clubs in Europe without the need for a billionaire pumping money in left right and centre. They survive off their revenue and thats how every football club should be run.

I can't be bothered to get into a debate about Southampton but if you read this and tell me everything is rosy and been sorted out, then thats the reason i cannot be bothered to get into a debate - http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/...ortese-pochettino-liebherr-and-saints-future/ - Southampton have had a good season, but football isn't about a season, it's about stability, investment from revenue and a long term plan and success - if you think thats what they have at Southampton then........

Why will clubs need Champions league money less and less to survive? What exactly changes in the premier league when ALL the clubs in it are about to get huge money? Champions League money will still be a significant amount of extra revenue the clubs who qualify for it get thats the clubs who don't qualify for it don't get, add in the advertising and promotion of the brand and that top players will only want to play for clubs in the champions league and i see it as a basic necessity for any club wanting to be successful.
 
What is Mansour doing exactly for Manchester? Does it change the fact that that football club is entirely at the mercy of his will and pocket? Does that make Man City one of the most financially risky clubs in England? No i absolutely would not want that for Everton, i think anyone who wants this high stakes roulette to continue in football is certifiable. We are going to end up with every club owned by a billionaire throughout Europe wanting to form a European super league with a cup comp to go alongside it. You give me the choice of the Man City business model and finances or the Arsenal one and i go for Arsenal every time and twice on Sundays. One is built on the building of solid financial assets and resources working to provide significantly higher revenue than most other clubs and the other is built on middle east sand. Thats my opinion. Arsenal are the best run club in the country by an absolute mile off the pitch and they can compete with top clubs in Europe without the need for a billionaire pumping money in left right and centre. They survive off their revenue and thats how every football club should be run.

I can't be bothered to get into a debate about Southampton but if you read this and tell me everything is rosy and been sorted out, then thats the reason i cannot be bothered to get into a debate - http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/...ortese-pochettino-liebherr-and-saints-future/ - Southampton have had a good season, but football isn't about a season, it's about stability, investment from revenue and a long term plan and success - if you think thats what they have at Southampton then........

Why will clubs need Champions league money less and less to survive? What exactly changes in the premier league when ALL the clubs in it are about to get huge money? Champions League money will still be a significant amount of extra revenue the clubs who qualify for it get thats the clubs who don't qualify for it don't get, add in the advertising and promotion of the brand and that top players will only want to play for clubs in the champions league and i see it as a basic necessity for any club wanting to be successful.

You mention Southampton not having a long term plan. But, what exactly have we had these past 15 years???

Infrastructure wise since true blue holding originally took control, Southampton have had a new stadium and only recently completed an upgrade of 20 million to its training facilities.

We have erm...... had a marquee in the parkend and sold off two training facilities to lease our training ground. Some long term planning from us on that front.
 
What is Mansour doing exactly for Manchester? Does it change the fact that that football club is entirely at the mercy of his will and pocket? Does that make Man City one of the most financially risky clubs in England? No i absolutely would not want that for Everton, i think anyone who wants this high stakes roulette to continue in football is certifiable. We are going to end up with every club owned by a billionaire throughout Europe wanting to form a European super league with a cup comp to go alongside it. You give me the choice of the Man City business model and finances or the Arsenal one and i go for Arsenal every time and twice on Sundays. One is built on the building of solid financial assets and resources working to provide significantly higher revenue than most other clubs and the other is built on middle east sand. Thats my opinion. Arsenal are the best run club in the country by an absolute mile off the pitch and they can compete with top clubs in Europe without the need for a billionaire pumping money in left right and centre. They survive off their revenue and thats how every football club should be run.

I can't be bothered to get into a debate about Southampton but if you read this and tell me everything is rosy and been sorted out, then thats the reason i cannot be bothered to get into a debate - http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/...ortese-pochettino-liebherr-and-saints-future/ - Southampton have had a good season, but football isn't about a season, it's about stability, investment from revenue and a long term plan and success - if you think thats what they have at Southampton then........

Why will clubs need Champions league money less and less to survive? What exactly changes in the premier league when ALL the clubs in it are about to get huge money? Champions League money will still be a significant amount of extra revenue the clubs who qualify for it get thats the clubs who don't qualify for it don't get, add in the advertising and promotion of the brand and that top players will only want to play for clubs in the champions league and i see it as a basic necessity for any club wanting to be successful.
Tbf korenke who is arsenals leading shareholder is loaded (net worth of 6.3 bil) that being said he does know how to run sports teams. Owns quite a few in the U.S. Has plans to build a 2 billion dollar football (American)stadium in LA with no public funding
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top