The Everton Board Thread 2015/16 [ Not takeover related ]

[allen]

They're not too level headed then if a few random opinions they don't like colour their judgement on the facts this guy is listing.

I'm talking generally, not specifically about this guy.

Kenwright gets blamed for everything by a vocal minority - including most recently making Stones submit a transfer request. That's transparently absurd, so they come off looking like conspiracy nuts. That then tarnishes the whole anti-board movement.

 

[Chang Elephant]

Kenwright gets blamed for everything by a vocal minority - including most recently making Stones submit a transfer request. That's transparently absurd, so they come off looking like conspiracy nuts. That then tarnishes the whole anti-board movement.

Have you seen the stories now emerging in the media that Chelsea though they had a pre agreed valuation with us, and that Stones would be sold once they offered 34M ? Who would have made that agreement ?

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

Have you seen the stories now emerging in the media that Chelsea though they had a pre agreed valuation with us, and that Stones would be sold once they offered 34M ? Who would have made that agreement ?

Well done for just providing a classic example of exactly the type of thing he was talking about. Hilarious

Oh and btw, if there was a supposed agreement for £34m why have they never offered that amount? Of course it's true like.....honest, same as Bill forcing the lad to put his ticket in, in tears he was........

 

[The Esk]

Have you seen the stories now emerging in the media that Chelsea though they had a pre agreed valuation with us, and that Stones would be sold once they offered 34M ? Who would have made that agreement ?

I've not read the papers today but if such an agreement existed why did Chelsea come in with an original bid of £ 20 million and the subsequent incremental increases?

 

[davek]

Well done for just providing a classic example of exactly the type of thing he was talking about. Hilarious

Oh and btw, if there was a supposed agreement for £34m why have they never offered that amount? Of course it's true like.....honest, same as Bill forcing the lad to put his ticket in, in tears he was........

You're here giving support to a group of men who've provided £4.5M for a summer transfer window?

Seriously?

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

You're here giving support to a group of men who've provided £4.5M for a summer transfer window?

Seriously?

Support? Where have I done that? In your own time

 

[davek]

Support? Where have done that? In your own time

Ha Ha Ha.

Then let's hear you criticise them then?

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

Ha Ha Ha.

Then let's hear you criticise them then?

So this support?

Can't find it then?

Feel free to pipe down

 

[davek]

So this support?

Can't find it then?

Feel free to pipe down

Ha Ha.

What, no support for them by shooting down EVERYTHING thrown at them by their critics on here? Are you sure you want to pursue that self defence? Pffft.

Anyway:
£4.5M spent.

In your own time....

 

[Chang Elephant]

I've not read the papers today but if such an agreement existed why did Chelsea come in with an original bid of £ 20 million and the subsequent incremental increases?

Who knows, it makes the board look good, strong, capable when they "hardball" Chelsea up to 34M ? Conspiracy theory.....which other clubs have put up a false investment proposition and paraded Chris Samuelson (well known to Vibrac btw) at an AGM to force off a co director, these knobhounds are well capable of it.

 

[Dithering Dougie]

Have you seen the stories now emerging in the media that Chelsea though they had a pre agreed valuation with us, and that Stones would be sold once they offered 34M ? Who would have made that agreement ?

You got a link please Changy.

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

Ha Ha.

What, no support for them by shooting down EVERYTHING thrown at them by their critics on here? Are you sure you want to pursue that self defence? Pffft.

Anyway:
£4.5M spent.

In your own time....

Still nothing then.....

Oh well.

 

[davek]

Who knows, it makes the board look good, strong, capable when they "hardball" Chelsea up to 34M ? Conspiracy theory.....which other clubs have put up a false investment proposition and paraded Chris Samuelson (well known to Vibrac btw) at an AGM to force off a co director, these knobhounds are well capable of it.

TBH, that Express story did look like a load of bollocks. However, the wider point about this board re-branding/re-positioning themselves as standing up to evil-doers is correct, imo. (something the esk wouldn't argue with you on I dont think...he's been arguing that line too)

 

[allen]

Have you seen the stories now emerging in the media that Chelsea though they had a pre agreed valuation with us, and that Stones would be sold once they offered 34M ? Who would have made that agreement ?

The key word there is 'stories,' isn't it?

 

[davek]

Still nothing then.....

Oh well.

No mate 'nothing'...just every point in every response you make in this thread.

PMSL at the thought of you projecting yourself as a neutral on this board issue....as I'm sure many others will be doing too!