PhilEFC
Player Valuation: £35m
Think it's fermented Elephant urine and vinegar but never drunk it myself.
Yeah, I was thinking it was more horse piss but now you mention it...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Think it's fermented Elephant urine and vinegar but never drunk it myself.
No idea about the Chang link mate. But just look at the picture of Bill lad, these rumours have been strong for a while now and aren't without foundation imo, almost certainly driven by his health situation. I think change is very close.
It's just mainlined straight back out from the stand urinals. The board is using our loyalty and feeding us our own waste products.Yeah, I was thinking it was more horse piss but now you mention it...
I could see that actually. No figurehead, but led instead by a technocrat like Elstone or similar (probably one of the intake of suits they hired in the summer with greater experience of the business world than bean counter Elstone).50% to Earl and 50% to Woods.
It's just mainlined straight back out from the stand urinals. The board is using our loyalty and feeding us our own waste products.
50% to Earl and 50% to Woods.
I could see that actually. No figurehead, but led instead by a technocrat like Elstone or similar (probably one of the intake of suits they hired in the summer with greater experience of the business world than bean counter Elstone).
I think it's going to be more of a case of plus ca change than revolutionary change...unfortunately.
It would if they're not his shares. It has been speculated on in the past.Assuming Bill was to sell his stake, which is what I assume you are referring to why at this stage would Woods and Earl stump up £29 million each to purchase Bill's shares ? (assuming £225 million valuation) - Earl would have 36% and Woods 32% - neither a controlling interest.
Does not make sense.
BTw there is no evidence he wants to sell his shares to Woods and Earl - this is just idle speculation without foundation.
Without foundation....It would if they're not his shares. It has been speculated on in the past.
I'm sure whoever buys us won't ever be good enough for us for some on here.
It would if they're not his shares. It has been speculated on in the past.
didn't Arsenal have something in place like that if shares went up for sale the current members got first tibs on them ?.Assuming Bill was to sell his stake, which is what I assume you are referring to why at this stage would Woods and Earl stump up £29 million each to purchase Bill's shares ? (assuming £225 million valuation) - Earl would have 36% and Woods 32% - neither a controlling interest.
Does not make sense.
BTw there is no evidence he wants to sell his shares to Woods and Earl - this is just idle speculation without foundation.
I dont trust Kenwright to sell to the right person either.