Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

The Everton Board Thread 2015/16 [ Not takeover related ]

Is it time for change?

  • I'm happy with the way thing are. Kenwright and the Board should stay.

    Votes: 75 10.2%
  • Kenwright and the board need to go. We need change.

    Votes: 558 76.2%
  • I'm indifferent. Can't decide.

    Votes: 99 13.5%

  • Total voters
    732
Status
Not open for further replies.
It would if they're not his shares. It has been speculated on in the past.
Speculated being the operative word.
The beneficial ownership is stated in the accounts prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and duly audited.
Note the phrase beneficial ownership as this is who ultimately owns them.
In fact at least 5/6ths of "BK's" shares are held by Bill Kenwright 1878 Ltd.
 

No, the buyer felt they had no retail value, & were costing the club thousands each year, don't forget, they take nothing six days a week, kept on the balance sheet for sentimental reasons, but they had negative equity !

So any serious buyer would complete the acquisition, and then attempt to sell off any unwanted assets, or if not able to do so just close them down. No-one who is serious would walk away for that reason.
 

No, the buyer felt they had no retail value, & were costing the club thousands each year, don't forget, they take nothing six days a week, kept on the balance sheet for sentimental reasons, but they had negative equity !

So these awful businessmen didn't want to drain the business of unnecessary expenditure..

How bloody awful of these awful businessmen.
 
That's total speculation, and if proved correct has serious consequences for many parties as you well know. The PL are satisfied as to the ownership as I am sure the auditors are.
The PL are a joke who would have turned a blind eye to whichever people owned Leeds from offshore if HM Govnt hadn't put a bomb up their arses.

Everton's shareownership: I'd put that in with Lord Lucan and Shergar as one of the great mysteries of our time, tbh. I wouldn't rule anything out.
 
Last edited:
So any serious buyer would complete the acquisition, and then attempt to sell off any unwanted assets, or if not able to do so just close them down. No-one who is serious would walk away for that reason.
But you are closing down peoples livelihoods, the memorandum & articles won't let that happen, Bill had it written in to them ! You can't do it, it's like the constitution if you like !
 
The PL are a joke who would have turned a blind eye to whichever people owned Leeds from offshore if HM Govnt hadn't put up a bomb up their arses.

Everton's shareownership: I'd put that in with Lord Lucan and Shergar as one of the great mysteries of our time, tbh. I wouldn't rule anything out.

Whilst I share some of your thoughts re the PL, I can't believe Deloitte would be so lax as to allow a criminal act of such magnitude to occur under their watch.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top