The Everton Board Thread 2015/16 [ Not takeover related ]

[TheFinnFan]

Cooperate is sound but at the end of the day it will still be the same useless board

interweb warrior inc.
cmoon

grow up

*no offence mate

 

[sageyefc]

17 suicidal voters out of over 300

Elstone spending his day creating multi's

 

[Verbal Kint]

Nobody is asking Kenwright, Woods, Earl and Green to pack their suitcases, all climb into a van together and then drive off now leaving the club with no organisation whatsover. Instead, make real efforts to move the club on. Accept that can't sell the club on their own and appoint a group of individuals to find a suitable buyer for the club and negotiate any possible sale. If/when a suitable buyer is found then they should stand aside. Many have been saying this for years and it's not like it's some unrealistic request. I don't know how many times people have to say this before other supporters who aren't sure what grasp it.

I would love if they packed suitcases at John Lennon and invested it back into the club... It would be more than they have done in 16 years.

 

[EFCPaul]

I want a group that co-operates with the board. not some pub gang.

They is such a group, they're called the Fans' Forum. All they're allowed to ask club officials about is whether Goodison should sell Coke or Pepsi. The board don't give a sh*te about supporters, they've proven that time and time again.

 

[banno]

I want a group that co-operates with the board. not some pub gang.

We all do and we have been waiting a long time. Think its the board unwilling to co-operate with anyone who is not willing to put money into the club for nothing back. They seem either unwilling to sell or asking far too high a price.

 

[sageyefc]

interweb warrior inc.
cmoon

grow up

*no offence mate

You're not even making sense anymore just trying to Have a few sly digs, try debating properly

 

[TheFinnFan]

You're not even making sense anymore just trying to Have a few sly digs, try debating properly

off to sleep. you won.

 

[magicjuan]

Agree, however 2 weeks before the closure of the window seems odd especially when the manager is still talking about additions.

Yes, but it's like deja vu all over again....coincidental with loans being reissued etc, no way to manage a fragile business

 

[The Esk]

Shame the club couldn't break away into 2 mini clubs with those wanting change going one way and leaving those who [Poor language removed] off any attempt by evertonians to raise issues/make a stand with the current lot.

Even if we were left to fund it ourselves I would be shocked if 'our' club didn't improve with a new board of businessmen on board whilst that lot still clap clap clapped mediocrity.

The last time there was a breakaway was 1892.....

If you don't agree with a fellow Evertonian then you need to convince him/her by your argument, not by ridiculing their stance.

 

[Chang Elephant]

L O L
you know exactly that you are small small minority in everton fan base

It's alright for you lads in Rekjavic but most scousers are worried about the board

 

[TheFinnFan]

It's alright for you lads in Rekjavic but most scousers are worried about the board

i have my doubts too, dont get me wrong, im just a old school fella who doesnt like mutinys.
*im not from iceland btw x

 

[Dithering Dougie]

L O L
you know exactly that you are small small minority in everton fan base

He's very small minded Finners

 

[The Esk]

Yes, but it's like deja vu all over again....coincidental with loans being reissued etc, no way to manage a fragile business

I agree and there's a very simple argument to put to the Board.

The club is desperately short of capital as a result of 16 years of no investment.

There's three sources of capital - the existing Board, new investors alongside the Board, or new owners.

Which of the three is it to be?

That's the argument and message to be presented to the Board.

 

[sageyefc]

off to sleep. you won.

Xx

 

[sageyefc]

I agree and there's a very simple argument to put to the Board.

The club is desperately short of capital as a result of 16 years of no investment.

There's 3 sources of capital - the existing Board, new investors alongside the Board, or new owners.

Which of the three is it to be?

That's the argument and message to be presented to the Board.

Sadly I can't see any of them options happening