In honesty the fact he's an Evertonian makes a massive difference yes. But my basic point is what, or who, is the alternative?
In the last ten years fifteen english clubs have spent more gross then us, 14 more net, 8 have higher wage bills and nine top flight clubs have less debt. And in terms of income ten get more money through sponsers, eight more through commercial means and eight more through tickets on match day. We make a loss every year so have to sell assets (our training ground, wayne rooney, mikel arteta etc just to make do)
So the answer would be any of the owners of the 15 clubs who outspend us would be better as they all earn more money and so spend more on the team.
Charles Green of Rangers claims that everton is only for sale for between 300 and 400 million pounds. If that's true then lots and lots of potential owners will pass us by because you can buy Man U for that money.