Echo have it now.
I think Moshiri purchased a majority stake in the club?I’m not sure, when Moshiri came in fans kept saying it was a takeover when it clearly wasn’t.
There’s always something with us isn’t there, there’s always a hitch or something underwhelming.
The article mentions the terms takeover and investment. They aren't necessarily the same thing. The article isn't particularly clear.MSP Sports Capital sign exclusivity agreement with Farhad Moshiri as Everton takeover draws closer
MSP Sports Capital and Everton owner Farhad Moshiri have signed an exclusivity agreement as they edge closer to a takeover deal.
Moshiri needs investment to help fund the new stadium and it was reported by the Daily Mail that the American Investment company had moved ahead of 777 Partners in the race to take a stake of the club.
Now a tweet from Sky Sports journalist Alan Myers (22 May) says documents have been signed for the two parties to enter an exclusivity period, although a full deal is still some way off being done despite talks “progressing well”.
“American investment company MSP Sports Capital have signed an exclusivity agreement with Everton owner Farhad Moshiri as the club head into a crucial weekend which sees a three-way battle to stay in the Premier League,” he wrote on his personal Twitter account.
“The New York based company has been in discussions with Moshiri for months and is now in pole position to provide investment into the club. SSN has been told the deal is “progressing well” however there is still work to be done before it’s officially announced.
“The Everton owner is adamant the main focus this week should be on Sean Dyche and his team preserving the club’s Premier League status when they play Bournemouth on Sunday, with two out of three clubs, including Leeds and Leicester, still with a possibility of being relegated.
I think Moshiri purchased a majority stake in the club?
The article mentions the terms takeover and investment. They aren't necessarily the same thing. The article isn't particularly clear.
Myers is describing it as investment rather than takeover. Given the financial state of the club it’s probably necessary to keep the lights on and the builders on site so it’s a good thing. But it doesn’t solve the long term issues or the root cause of the financial difficulties. Hopefully they are at least insistent on big changes.The article mentions the terms takeover and investment. They aren't necessarily the same thing. The article isn't particularly clear.
On Alan Myers Twitter post he says he expects changes in the boardroom.I was under the impression a takeover would mean new people coming in and a complete change of personnel. It was clearly defined as investment not a takeover yet people called it a takeover. Some even thought it was a Man City situation.
I was under the impression a takeover would mean new people coming in and a complete change of personnel. It was clearly defined as investment not a takeover yet people called it a takeover. Some even thought it was a Man City situation.
A takeover to me would involve purchasing a majority of the shares in the club, i.e. more than 50%. Because that gives the investor control over the company in terms of voting etc. You don't need 100% or close for it to be a takeover, but you need a majority of the shares.They can be the same thing and investment can incrementally lead to a takeover - that's how Moshiri started.
Can also be a senior debt arrangement - last i heard thats what was going to happen - that was before 777 seemed to play their takeover card.
But overall i suspect no one knows at this point.
On Alan Myers Twitter post he says he expects changes in the boardroom.
A takeover to me would involve purchasing a majority of the shares in the club, i.e. more than 50%. Because that gives the investor control over the company in terms of voting etc.