And I'm sure by 'hold them to account' they were referring to their performance, not health.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
And I'm sure by 'hold them to account' they were referring to their performance, not health.
tommye
Player Valuation: £100m
Wtf has that got to do with the crap released yesterday?
You've gone all Big Bird Damo...
Damo_1878
Don't care. Not bothered.
If his health means there was a possibility he or another director cannot fulfil his duties shareholders have a right to know
Indeed the EFC AGM was the actual forum for that type of issue
Why cancel it?
I'm going to repeat this again for you, if I could repeat it slowly I would
Everton are not obliged to hold AGMs because they are a Private Limited Company
Damo_1878
Don't care. Not bothered.
Only as they changed the articles of association without consultation to remove that obligation
Why do that when they did?
You can be ill and still perform work duties. There is protection for employees to be supported during periods of ill health rather than persecuted for that.
The campaign should have continued to focus on performance, not diverge to health concerns.
Damo_1878
Don't care. Not bothered.
No one is persecuting anyone
A director has legal obligations over and above standard employee obligations
They come from the companies act. Below.
tommye
Player Valuation: £100m
Damo_1878
Don't care. Not bothered.
Only as they changed the articles of association without consultation to remove that obligation
Why do that when they did in January 2022?
Correct.
Still iffy though for a private company who pushes their engagement at every opportunity.
We like to believe/think football is a very different business. Whether thats true...
To remove it is a shame and feels evasive to me.
So why has the statement been pulled (If it has) and do you disagree with it being pulled?
They are not obliged by law to hold them
I don't know why they decided to stop them but I presume it is because they are a terribly run organisation that we want to leave our club
Communication is one of their biggest issues
Promises and Lies
Smoke and Mirrors
Headlocks and Posters
Palace and Leicester
Good and Times
That is more than enough for most to want them out like we do
But if you think the Law supports your other arguments in this, you are wrong, and there is no shame in that, legislation can be tricky and I've often been wrong myself
Damo_1878
Don't care. Not bothered.
I would say that there are people within Everton Football Club at board level (and below and Farhad Moshiri) with questions to answer
on why the EFC AGM was cancelled when it now emerges the Chairman was in ill health
Absolutely
They are a bunch of gaslighters, pretending to be the people's club but treating the people like an inconvenience
Damo_1878
Don't care. Not bothered.
The law was changed, however companies whose articles of association required them were still required to hold them
Why did the club change the articles of association to remove the AGM?
Why? Is the timing not suspicious in itself?
I think it is. Raises questions as to what has been going on
- Status