The Heatwave

Status
Not open for further replies.

I said nothing about "hype messaging" I said responding agencies in the UK had a duty to Warn, inform and advise the public.

You're conflating two distinct things again, not sure if you're doing it deliberately or not, but warning, informing and advising about Heatwave "stay cool, stay hydrated and cover up" (which is the generic public messaging) is not the same thing as people talking about the long term effects of climate change and using a 40 degree threshold being hit as evidence of that.

The point you followed up about infrastructure...what do you think the effect on a local health economy is in the UK if a server overheats and fails is?

Or an additional 10% increase in patients through UEC pathways across that health economy?

How well prepared are UK hospitals for 38 degree + temperatures - maternity services, burns units, old buildings (around 30% of the UK hospital infrastructure is around 60 years old), medicines storage facilities, mortuary cooling, power infrastructure?
We broadly agree on these things. But my analysis is a reaction to the hype, which is doing the conflating to begin with (occasional hot weather = dramatic Climate Crisis).

You recall when it's really cold and folk wonder what happened to Global Warming? This gets answered by the usual suspects with weather is not climate!

The same doesn't seem to apply when it's really hot...but principally it should.



This doesn't really nullify the wider point of media-alarmism via increased use of the emotive colour red. Click on his Tweet, and scroll down to his 7th post. You get his genuine image...how much different is it really? There's the dark-reds/charcoal too:

Screenshot_20220719-023809051~2.jpg



It pays to be wary of info online, even when the argument is the other side. Here I identified some misinformation (or maybe just plain misunderstanding) doing the rounds about generally what's causing the Earth getting hotter:





After some digging i realised he was referring to the Milankovitch cycles, which are mega-longterm changes to Earth's orbital distance to the sun, causing changes in average Earth temperatures over periods of millions of years. It's not a suitable explanation for the increase we've seen in the last 150 years, as NASA explained here:



Also this claim here that the UK 2010's were on average cooler than the decade previous: i haven't been able to verify it:





Agendas & narratives are everywhere, it's a challenge to filter them out. Even debunks (aka fact-checks) often have their own narrative at play. It's a minefield out there.



Either way, tomorrow is gonna be hot...maybe even dangerously so. Personally we'll be staying in with curtains drawn.


Long-term: it does look like average-temps are increasing, and fossil-fuels contribute. But how on Earth do we get the whole world agreeing on what to do when even a GOT-discussion rarely ends in a compromise?


Human nature is what it is...and it will adapt to what's coming, we just can't foresee how yet.
 
We broadly agree on these things. But my analysis is a reaction to the hype, which is doing the conflating to begin with (occasional hot weather = dramatic Climate Crisis).

You recall when it's really cold and folk wonder what happened to Global Warming? This gets answered by the usual suspects with weather is not climate!

The same doesn't seem to apply when it's really hot...but principally it should.



This doesn't really nullify the wider point of media-alarmism via increased use of the emotive colour red. Click on his Tweet, and scroll down to his 7th post. You get his genuine image...how much different is it really? There's the dark-reds/charcoal too:

View attachment 174223



It pays to be wary of info online, even when the argument is the other side. Here I identified some misinformation (or maybe just plain misunderstanding) doing the rounds about generally what's causing the Earth getting hotter:





After some digging i realised he was referring to the Milankovitch cycles, which are mega-longterm changes to Earth's orbital distance to the sun, causing changes in average Earth temperatures over periods of millions of years. It's not a suitable explanation for the increase we've seen in the last 150 years, as NASA explained here:



Also this claim here that the UK 2010's were on average cooler than the decade previous: i haven't been able to verify it:





Agendas & narratives are everywhere, it's a challenge to filter them out. Even debunks (aka fact-checks) often have their own narrative at play. It's a minefield out there.



Either way, tomorrow is gonna be hot...maybe even dangerously so. Personally we'll be staying in with curtains drawn.


Long-term: it does look like average-temps are increasing, and fossil-fuels contribute. But how on Earth do we get the whole world agreeing on what to do when even a GOT-discussion rarely ends in a compromise?


Human nature is what it is...and it will adapt to what's coming, we just can't foresee how yet.

That was a very long way of saying "I've absolutely no idea"

Nb: I'd just assume Toby Young is wrong, because he often is and just presents contrarian Ill informed opinion as fact ignoring context and nuance.
 

Toffee, i'm gonna just try to help you understand this...here's the full quote:


2% rise is less than a 14% rise.

Here's the other full quote:


And here's what you said:


600 deaths is less than 6,600 deaths.


Here's the piece again for full reference. So yes, the media are panicking everyone, as per.


Hope it's clear now.
Good god man, are you still trying to claim that a 2% increase is actually a decrease? I think the heat is getting to you.

Stay indoors and drink lots of water.
 
Good god man, are you still trying to claim that a 2% increase is actually a decrease? I think the heat is getting to you.

Stay indoors and drink lots of water.
you don't understand the text.

it's not a 2% increase over the previous period, it's a 2% mortality-rise over the benchmark-temperature, which is less than the 14% rise from the previous years.

The article further backed this up by quoting 6,600 deaths for the 2003 summer, whereas you quoted 600 deaths for this summer period.

The headline has "related deaths drop" in it, so of course it's about a decrease.


There's no further way to simplify it. Either you're interested in understanding, or you prefer to live in your own headcanon.


Not arsed either way at this point.
 

I started to feel a bit uncomfortable about 5pm yesterday. Hadn't been out, just sat in the home office all day, which hit 32c according to the boilers thermostat. Got in the shower, turned the temp right down... bliss.

Which lasted about 10 mins. Ended up in the garden firing the hospipe into the air in bursts to simulate rain. Cooled us (me, the dog, the missus) right down. That was at 8pm.

I am not looking forward to today. Colour me snowflake.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top