Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

The New Arena

What do you seek?

  • Bread

    Votes: 23 17.6%
  • Circus

    Votes: 33 25.2%
  • Aggro

    Votes: 75 57.3%

  • Total voters
    131
Status
Not open for further replies.
Illegal entry possibly, but that’s just depends on the current governments definition. However illegal entry doesn’t make that individual an illegal immigrant, it’s just how they enter the country. The UK government has basically made laws that don’t comply with international law which is why there have been no deportations and Rwanda still hasn’t happened.

Why they let them stay after claims fail? God knows, our government is a disgrace and screws up constantly. Loads of reports of deportation flights being blocked by the courts. Essentially, our government acts illegally al the time.

Why uk? All sorts of reasons. Friends and family, relatively decent rates of asylum claims being accepted, if claim approved, then outcomes to remain are good. Could even go back as far as “the empire” in that the uk has had influence across large parts of the world and that history still has impacts on people views of what the uk can offer.

All reasonable points. My original point about who is paying for the successful asylum seekers -- surely this is indirectly from taxation and other means where the government diverts funds.

If so, then if the levels of asylum seekers continue to rise surely this is a cost that needs to be paid from somewhere?

Unless im missing something and its through donations or an international body?


With Poland being in the news recently due to their way of life rising and them proudly stating they havent brought in asylum seekers (or many of them?) does this mean they have contravened international law?

I know in the last couple of years Japan was under alot of pressure to accept more and had to give in.
 
All reasonable points. My original point about who is paying for the successful asylum seekers -- surely this is indirectly from taxation and other means where the government diverts funds.

If so, then if the levels of asylum seekers continue to rise surely this is a cost that needs to be paid from somewhere?

Unless im missing something and its through donations or an international body?


With Poland being in the news recently due to their way of life rising and them proudly stating they havent brought in asylum seekers (or many of them?) does this mean they have contravened international law?

I know in the last couple of years Japan was under alot of pressure to accept more and had to give in.
There’s this fantastic system in the uk where once granted asylum people can actually work …. Amazing revelation I know
 
Here’s something else for your reaction score



Thats exactly how you come across to me...freezing your tits off sitting on an old mouldy sofa too lazy to stick the heating on...just reaching for yesterdays half eaten kebab on the floor.

Middle finger at the laptop with a big smile on your filthy face.

My reaction score is massive btw. Come back to me when you’re all Top 10.

I responded to someone with the facts.

As if i knew what it was lol

I saw @Goat is in first place...he also was very proud of this a few years ago.

Well done @Goat ;) lol

Isnt it wonderful to congratulate others instead of being mean...
 
Thats exactly how you come across to me...freezing your tits off sitting on an old mouldy sofa too lazy to stick the heating on...just reaching for yesterdays half eaten kebab on the floor.

Middle finger at the laptop with a big smile on your filthy face.



I responded to someone with the facts.

As if i knew what it was lol

I saw @Goat is in first place...he also was very proud of this a few years ago.

Well done @Goat ;) lol

Isnt it wonderful to congratulate others instead of being mean...

He’s been like farming off match previews for ages the little rat.
 

Thats exactly how you come across to me...freezing your tits off sitting on an old mouldy sofa too lazy to stick the heating on...just reaching for yesterdays half eaten kebab on the floor.

Middle finger at the laptop with a big smile on your filthy face.



I responded to someone with the facts.

As if i knew what it was lol

I saw @Goat is in first place...he also was very proud of this a few years ago.

Well done @Goat ;) lol

Isnt it wonderful to congratulate others instead of being mean...
What strange sexual fantasies you have of fellow posters.
 

All reasonable points. My original point about who is paying for the successful asylum seekers -- surely this is indirectly from taxation and other means where the government diverts funds.

If so, then if the levels of asylum seekers continue to rise surely this is a cost that needs to be paid from somewhere?

Unless im missing something and its through donations or an international body?


With Poland being in the news recently due to their way of life rising and them proudly stating they havent brought in asylum seekers (or many of them?) does this mean they have contravened international law?

I know in the last couple of years Japan was under alot of pressure to accept more and had to give in.
So people seeking asylum are not allowed to work (even though the majority of them want to). The claims are meant to be processed in 6 months but often take longer.

Asylum seekers get put into basic, not fit for purpose, already council owned housing. (And in most cases it is appalling conditions). They then get £50 per week to buy food, toiletries and clothing. (Only get £9 a week if their accommodation provides food). And it is pre loaded on a card meaning they can’t buy other things with it. (In the grand scheme of things, paying for food for asylum seekers is fairly negligible)

If their claim is approved (usually for 5 years), and they become a refugee, they can claim benefits however the same restrictions apply to them as to a uk citizen. Most refugees go on to find work.

In terms of rising claims, there was 67k asylum claims made last year, which was 17% lower than the previous year.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top