Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

The summer 14 other clubs transfers thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Not sure if this has already been discussed but Swansea have been a bit naughty over the Vorm transfer to Tottenham. Because they would have owed 30% of any fees received to his previous club (Utrecht) they've basically said he was given for free as part of the swap deal where him and Davies went to Spurs and Sigurdsson went to them.

Utrecht are rightly (in my opinion) fuming as he's a dutch international, had 2 years lefton his deal and is only 30 years old. Swansea have said they're looking after the best interests of their club and that they've done everything by the book, and even though I suppose they have, I think it's wrong personally.

Not sure what everyone else thinks?
 
Agreed. Hopefully they'll have burned agent and club bridges. If true
Whitty said:
Not sure if this has already been discussed but Swansea have been a bit naughty over the Vorm transfer to Tottenham. Because they would have owed 30% of any fees received to his previous club (Utrecht) they've basically said he was given for free as part of the swap deal where him and Davies went to Spurs and Sigurdsson went to them.

Utrecht are rightly (in my opinion) fuming as he's a dutch international, had 2 years lefton his deal and is only 30 years old. Swansea have said they're looking after the best interests of their club and that they've done everything by the book, and even though I suppose they have, I think it's wrong personally.

Not sure what everyone else thinks?
Click to expand...
 
They have to give each asset a value.

So swapping 2 assets for another would mean all assets have values.

Also legally they woud be screwed as the value of the asset would likely be determined by the court and they would need to pay.

Kind of disgusting really.


Whitty said:
Not sure if this has already been discussed but Swansea have been a bit naughty over the Vorm transfer to Tottenham. Because they would have owed 30% of any fees received to his previous club (Utrecht) they've basically said he was given for free as part of the swap deal where him and Davies went to Spurs and Sigurdsson went to them.

Utrecht are rightly (in my opinion) fuming as he's a dutch international, had 2 years lefton his deal and is only 30 years old. Swansea have said they're looking after the best interests of their club and that they've done everything by the book, and even though I suppose they have, I think it's wrong personally.

Not sure what everyone else thinks?
Click to expand...
 

Whitty said:
Not sure if this has already been discussed but Swansea have been a bit naughty over the Vorm transfer to Tottenham. Because they would have owed 30% of any fees received to his previous club (Utrecht) they've basically said he was given for free as part of the swap deal where him and Davies went to Spurs and Sigurdsson went to them.

Utrecht are rightly (in my opinion) fuming as he's a dutch international, had 2 years lefton his deal and is only 30 years old. Swansea have said they're looking after the best interests of their club and that they've done everything by the book, and even though I suppose they have, I think it's wrong personally.

Not sure what everyone else thinks?
Click to expand...

it's a hard one to gauge isn't it? depends what the contract says i think. if it says it's a swap deal, is it against the rules to not pay a sell on fee?

think swansea have been mugged off enough by the deal as it is, ha
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register
Back
Top