This nurse Letby case

[Kev The Rat]

The system is the killer mate.

Blaming doctors and nurses is scapegoating.

As long as you accept this whole issue has become hugely politicised and isn’t really about the specific case of Letby’s guilt or otherwise, then that’s fair enough

 

[Amw79]

I’ve got no idea whether she’s guilty or not, but something has seemed off with this for ages.

Immediately after the conviction, it was online sleuths putting YouTube videos out about her innocence, which got instant massive traction in the mainstream.

We had the story a couple of months ago with the defence saying that one of the key prosecution doctors had changed his mind on the evidence he gave, only for the next day that doctor to come out and say that claim was incorrect.

Then this panel of experts with David Davis floating around are independently reviewing evidence outside of the judicial process, as both her appeals have already been refused.

Something has seemed weird about the whole process and coverage, but I can’t put my finger on it, and don’t know what it means.

 

[Joey66]

I’m still really struggling with it.

At first I was all in that she was 100% guilty. Then totally flip flopped a few months back after the panorama doc. Now I’m sort of in the middle.

I don’t know what to make of these medical experts today tbf

I had 8 years with lawyers & believe me they will argue black is white to drag a case out for money - I got told from day one my case was a nailed on winner .... in a Trade Union civil case - horrible experience - win or lose ....
Almost a decade affecting myself & family - not nice .....

A civil case is so different your opposition are allowed to be in the court to watch you .....not like a crime case plus perjury does not exist ..... plus no jury just one judge ....

 

[Joey66]

I’ve got no idea whether she’s guilty or not, but something has seemed off with this for ages.

Immediately after the conviction, it was online sleuths putting YouTube videos out about her innocence, which got instant massive traction in the mainstream.

We had the story a couple of months ago with the defence saying that one of the key prosecution doctors had changed his mind on the evidence he gave, only for the next day that doctor to come out and say that claim was incorrect.

Then this panel of experts with David Davis floating around are independently reviewing evidence outside of the judicial process, as both her appeals have already been refused.

Something has seemed weird about the whole process and coverage, but I can’t put my finger on it, and don’t know what it means.

They are in it for money no such thing as justice - My barrister told me that .....

 

[LostLegend]

Hang her High - end of -

Don’t think we should be giving narcotics to condemned prisoners before their execution tbh

 

[Joey66]

Don’t think we should be giving narcotics to condemned prisoners before their execution tbh

Found Guilty - the legal aid budget must be getting hammered ....

 

[ClausThomsen]

How often do doctors or nurses get convicted of malpractice let alone murder ? Almost never.

That is the issue here, and some in the medical profession find this an affront to their perceived immunity, which is why these rival ‘experts’ have been rolled out today.

Letby herself means nothing in the grand scheme of what’s at stake here

The NMC hammer absolutely loads of nurses every single month. To get to the stage where a nurse is committing enough wrongdoing to get to a stage of legal malpractice where the police are involved and criminal charges forthcoming is very rare due to intervention much earlier.

Nurses having some form of 'immunity' is way off the mark.

 

[Wat Tyler]

I’ve got no idea whether she’s guilty or not, but something has seemed off with this for ages.

Immediately after the conviction, it was online sleuths putting YouTube videos out about her innocence, which got instant massive traction in the mainstream.

We had the story a couple of months ago with the defence saying that one of the key prosecution doctors had changed his mind on the evidence he gave, only for the next day that doctor to come out and say that claim was incorrect.

Then this panel of experts with David Davis floating around are independently reviewing evidence outside of the judicial process, as both her appeals have already been refused.

Something has seemed weird about the whole process and coverage, but I can’t put my finger on it, and don’t know what it means.

Do you think Davis and these online dullards saying “no way she done it” would be so passionate about it if her name was Sanjita, from an Asian family?

 

[Bryan+]

Eh why is this in the ale house

 

[PITA]

They are in it for money no such thing as justice - My barrister told me that .....

Apart from Rumpole of the Bailey, obvs.

 

[PITA]

Do you think Davis and these online dullards saying “no way she done it” would be so passionate about it if her name was Sanjita, from an Asian family?

Possibly, as long as she didn't support Rangers.

 

[Joey66]

Apart from Rumpole of the Bailey, obvs.

He was in it for the plonk & steak & kydney pudding watched an episode this week on TTP

 

[tonyhorne]

Do you think Davis and these online dullards saying “no way she done it” would be so passionate about it if her name was Sanjita, from an Asian family?

I went out with Sanjita once. Nice girl ...

 

[Kurt.]

I went out with Sanjita once. Nice girl ...

She had a gay sister called minjita….. lovely girl and lovely family.

 

[Kurt.]

Hang her High - end of -

Ah well, Joey has stated “end of”

No point in anyone carrying on trying to get to the truth anymore.