4737carlin
Player Valuation: £90m
Glad Reid missed that, dosent deserve to be on the score sheet with that hair cut
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have a feeling the only one who won't do that is FulhamCardiff would pull a Norwich, not really spend the money and improve the squad, bore everyone to death, go straight back down and trouser the parachute checks
Scott Parker celebration including combing his hair, nice touch
LAFC, an MLS side, have two midfielders playing tonight that are better than Tom Davies who started 23 premier league games this season. That’s grim.
Agreed on Roldan, though I think he’s in MLS for the long haul. This really has been a good watch so far. Seems like LAFC are just trying to outscore everyone this tournament while throwing caution to the wind. Not quite what I’m used to from a Bob Bradley side, but i guess you can do that when you have the most talent.Cristian Roldan for Seattle is probably better too.
Too bad this is airing in the middle of the night in Europe because I think this will end up being the highest quality game of the tournament.
LAFC, an MLS side, have two midfielders playing tonight that are better than Tom Davies who started 23 premier league games this season. That’s grim.
Bournemouth considering compensation claim over costly hawk eye error in favour of Villa (vs Sheff Utd) when all cameras had their view obscured and the goalmouth technology didn't work for the first time ever.
Not sure they've got much of a case tbh, as just something beyond normal chance considering the probability of it happening, and could easily just be compared to hundreds of errors with referree decisions and the interpretation of the VAR technology being error strewn. Just extremely unfortunate that only that point was the difference between going down and staying up.
Bournemouth considering compensation claim over costly hawk eye error in favour of Villa (vs Sheff Utd) when all cameras had their view obscured and the goalmouth technology didn't work for the first time ever.
Not sure they've got much of a case tbh, as just something beyond normal chance considering the probability of it happening, and could easily just be compared to hundreds of errors with referree decisions and the interpretation of the VAR technology being error strewn. Just extremely unfortunate that only that point was the difference between going down and staying up.
So would Bournemouth be level on points and goal difference without that point vs Shef U? Would it have gone on goals scored or something to see who would have stayed up?
You could also argue that Villa's approach to the remainder of that game where it occurred (vs Sheff U) would have been different had it stood as possibly would have been their approach to subsequent games.
They have a case in that hawk eye publically apologised for the error and could make a claim against both them and the prem league. They've compared it to the Carlos Tevez incident years ago (for West Ham) but unlikely to succeed I reckon