I don't agree, based upon his comments. He's going with a metrics-based approach and wants to grow revenue in part by importing ideas from American sports. The former did not work out well for FSG, in part because (IIRC) they failed to account for the fact that not every player can take their penalties when selecting their initial player recruitment targets.
I doubt Boehly is likely to replicate that particular mistake, but looking at their overpays this summer they seem to be making a lot of the same mistakes FSG did at the outset. The basic problem with the club's current thinking, IMO, is that there's no recognition of the fact that there is effectively a salary cap. Baseball doesn't have one. The other issue that I see is that there isn't recognition of the fact that albatross deals can't easily be moved off the books. That's less of a problem in baseball, where you can spend whatever you want in order to produce success, than it is in footy.
That much is pretty obvious to me. I'm a fairly disinterested observer, as compared to my ties to, say, my university's sports teams. My sense is that your experience is a lot more like that than my experience with respect to footy.