Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep. Weirdly the Talksport listeners/SSN viewers fall for it every single time.
I don't think we were signing him even if we had of sold Stones. I think it was just to cover up losing out to Stoke for Shaqiri.
The chances of us signing Yarmolenko were always going to be small. There's no way Martinez would pin his most important transfer on Yarmolenko without giving him time to move on to other targets.
Personally I think Payet was the player we were interested in and when he choose West Ham and Barkley's form improved we dropped the idea.
Oh dont you worry, we already know what you are.
Lennon is more likely to happen lad..Lamella/Preat/Nasri/Yarmo/Bernard.....one of these will happen.
Haven't we even got rid of Aids yet?
I think if you look back I have been proved right. I said we wouldn't get a No 10 back in July and would be left with Lennon and Evans. Ok I got Evans wrong but I think that was just because Jose pissed Martinez off.im sure you just make things up repeatably as you go along
He's a FIFA favourite.
we dont even need naismith in the team right now as it is.
so we could have just saved the money and wages until january, it's insane business not to accept that.
I think we've probably missed any chance of getting him now, unfortunately. Do you know if we ever considered meeting the asking price but then loaning him back to Kiev? Either until Jan or later depending on how they do in the Champions League? If the money was there for the purchase it wouldn't really have made any difference to us as we don't seem to have any other options lined up but we could have stood a much better chance of having him longer term.No idea if we were "late". No later than 5 other clubs who all got rejected either by player or owner I would guess. Not a clue re January. We can sign a preliminary with him then though.