Usmanov

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

Only if the increased revenue exceeds the costs of funding the Stadium.

That’s guaranteed due to the naming rights deal alone. Which is 100% incremental and will cover the annual debt cost.

What are you trying to prove here?

 

[gwladysnight]

That’s guaranteed due to the naming rights deal alone. Which is 100% incremental and will cover the annual debt cost.

What are you trying to prove here?

It isn't that simple. Stadium naming rights will have an effect on other sponsorship deals, Stadium naming rights will devalue the value of shirt sponsorship for instance. Then you have the problem that Stadium costs will go on for longer than the length of the naming rights deal.

A lot of teams also struggle initially when they change to a new stadium which could have an effect on our revenues.

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

It isn't that simple. Stadium naming rights will have an effect on other sponsorship deals, Stadium naming rights will devalue the value of shirt sponsorship for instance. Then you have the problem that Stadium costs will go on for longer than the length of the naming rights deal.

A lot of teams also struggle initially when they change to a new stadium which could have an effect on our revenues.

Give an example of where a stadium sponsorship deal has devalued the value of that clubs main shirt sponsor deal.

I’ll wait.

 

[Bluerobins]

If and when Usmanov comes on board openly, is there any way during the change in ownership he can put money in, writing off debt?

 

[ToothPlucker]

Usmanov sold his shares in Arsenal for £550m so I feel that this money is ring-fenced for his friend, our very own Farhad Moshiri and his beloved Everton.

 

[d34noj]

Give an example of where a stadium sponsorship deal has devalued the value of that clubs main shirt sponsor deal.

I’ll wait.

He's plucking at straws mate. Seems to be a lot of newbies trying to downplay the importance of Usmanov investing in here.

This is how simple this entire scenario is...

It's nothing but good news.

 

[gwladysnight]

Give an example of where a stadium sponsorship deal has devalued the value of that clubs main shirt sponsor deal.

I’ll wait.

Arsenal is the perfect example they signed a deal worth £100m with emirates for 15 year Stadium naming rights and 8 years shirt sponsorship starting in 2006. In 2005 Chelsea a Club of a similar stature signed a deal with Samsung for £50m over five seasons.

So Arsenal got a similar figure per year for Stadium and Shirt as Chelsea did for Shirt only. The reason is because one effects the other.

 

[blue1948]

Arsenal is the perfect example they signed a deal worth £100m with emirates for 15 year Stadium naming rights and 8 years shirt sponsorship starting in 2006. In 2005 Chelsea a Club of a similar stature signed a deal with Samsung for £50m over five seasons.

So Arsenal got a similar figure per year for Stadium and Shirt as Chelsea did for Shirt only. The reason is because one effects the other.

For your argument to have validation you must post every club in the league ,cherry picking one or two to suit the argument proves nothing .

 

[mahermi1]

It isn't that simple. Stadium naming rights will have an effect on other sponsorship deals, Stadium naming rights will devalue the value of shirt sponsorship for instance. Then you have the problem that Stadium costs will go on for longer than the length of the naming rights deal.

A lot of teams also struggle initially when they change to a new stadium which could have an effect on our revenues.

Optimism isn't your strongest suit, I take it fella.

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

Arsenal is the perfect example they signed a deal worth £100m with emirates for 15 year Stadium naming rights and 8 years shirt sponsorship starting in 2006. In 2005 Chelsea a Club of a similar stature signed a deal with Samsung for £50m over five seasons.

So Arsenal got a similar figure per year for Stadium and Shirt as Chelsea did for Shirt only. The reason is because one effects the other.

At the time Arsenal agreed that deal, Chelsea were getting £4m a year for their shirt sponsorship, so that was the yardstick at that point in time. To suggest the stadium sponsorship somehow devalued the value of their shirt is utter nonsense.

 

[Seathestars]

Was Usmanov in the crowd there or was it wishful thinking. I can’t rewind this app to check.

 

[gixerk6]

Was Usmanov in the crowd there or was it wishful thinking. I can’t rewind this app to check.

To be fair I was doing something else and just glanced up and thought I saw him there myself

 

[Seathestars]

To be fair I was doing something else and just glanced up and thought I saw him there myself

They mentioned the guys hat because of the cold weather, looked like him

 

[matty1878]

Except City are infinitely more wealthy than we are. They are also far better run.

Which is why the blinkered longing for Usmanov and the abolition of FFP is so short sighted. We should be focussing on how the Club is being run. It is inexcusable for commercial revenue to be falling when USM are pumping money in. It is inexcusable to be stagnating despite spending £450m on players since Moshiri arrived.

That is being completely ignored with the Uncle Uzi nonsense. We are acting like a lottery winner who just splashes the cash with no thought to how it is going to effect us.

Ok lol

 

[brettangellnightporter]

Actually the Tories were not defeated but enough of that this a football forum so can we stick to football, leave the polies stuff for the forum Alehouse or current affairs, you choose. Bye babe.

Check and mate