If we are prepared to bid £65m for Van Dijk then why not save £35m and get Sakko from THEM.
27, French International and their best centre back.
NOPE
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If we are prepared to bid £65m for Van Dijk then why not save £35m and get Sakko from THEM.
27, French International and their best centre back.
If we are prepared to bid £65m for Van Dijk then why not save £35m and get Sakko from THEM.
27, French International and their best centre back.
Sakho - can control the ball further than I can kick it.
Bambi on ice.
If we are prepared to bid £65m for Van Dijk then why not save £35m and get Sakko from THEM.
27, French International and their best centre back.
Moshiri gave us the 80 mil to cover the 54 mil debt so take that off, leave 154 mil before he invest himselfWell my 350m figure was including the Lukaku sale
137m from Sky
100m from Lukaku
18.5 from Geri and Clev
15m from USM
80m from Moshiri
Take away
86m wage bill
54m debts
20m managers comp
86m in transfers
Leaves us 104m to spend.
If we are prepared to bid £65m for Van Dijk then why not save £35m and get Sakko from THEM.
27, French International and their best centre back.
ANYONE who can photoshop this up, PLEASE?Him and Lukaku would be like watching table football.
If we are prepared to bid £65m for Van Dijk then why not save £35m and get Sakko from THEM.
27, French International and their best centre back.
Because he's worse than awfulIf we are prepared to bid £65m for Van Dijk then why not save £35m and get Sakko from THEM.
27, French International and their best centre back.
Liverpool's 'best defender' - that's an oxymoron surely???If we are prepared to bid £65m for Van Dijk then why not save £35m and get Sakko from THEM.
27, French International and their best centre back.