duncs pigeon
Player Valuation: £35m
Its a good way of winding a rs up when they say Chelski have no history ' they were winning in europe before you lot' lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My argument isn't about any particular metric.
It's about the pointlessness of it all. It's the last desperate straw clutch of a drowning man's argument.
My club is somehow better than yours because we won the league a few times when the players were wearing long shorts, had brylocreemed centre partings and smoked 3 cigs at halftime. Who's arsed outside that particular club?
Lets take your example to the extreme. Everton win the league, Champions League and FA Cup two years on the bounce while RS flounder in the Championship. How arsed are you exactly about their more trophy laden history and how much would you laugh if one of their cult tried claim superiority on that basis?
Suppose it depends how “bigger” is defined
Not strictly true. North and East London yes. South and West London no. FWIW of course Arsenal are historically a far more successful ‘bigger’ club but who gives a monkey’s? I don’t but I love it, just love it when we beat them. I still love to see Liverpool get beat the most though, so I suppose they must be the grand daddy of them all.Loads more Arsenal and Spurs fans in London than Chelsea fans, it’s not even close.
Chelsea probably have bigger global fanbase though as their success coincided with the premier leagues huge growth abroad in the mid 2000s
Every club has its share of idiotic ignoramuses though, even Everton. The ‘Everton are white’ chant didn’t exactly materialise out of thin air and before I get consigned to the bin I’d like to add that I don’t think that 99% of Everton fans are racist. You’re a good bunch, which is why I signed up on here!Arsenal no question, got the history, the fan base, everything about them is bigger. Their fans aren’t as racist either
What's the difference between traditional and modern perspectives? Chelsea's consistent success over the last 20 years is just as valid as Arsenal's success during the 1930's. A time when Arsenal were known as The Bank Of England Club due to their spending....the same kind of approach that people get sniffy about with any clubs that have recent success.Depends on your definition of what makes a big club. From a traditional perspective its Arsenal without question. From a modern perspective probably Chelsea.
Yeah that's true TBF.What's the difference between traditional and modern perspectives? Chelsea's consistent success over the last 20 years is just as valid as Arsenal's success during the 1930's. A time when Arsenal were known as The Bank Of England Club due to their spending....the same kind of approach that people get sniffy about with any clubs that have recent success.
A lot of people seem to get stuck on who was a "big" club during their childhood or teens and seem to discount anything more recent as artificial.
That's a good perspective to be fair.Depends on your definition of what makes a big club. From a traditional perspective its Arsenal without question. From a modern perspective probably Chelsea.