6 + 2 Point Deductions

[chicoazul]

I don't have any. Everton is literally all I have.

You are my friend pal.

 

[GoldenToffee]

Bobbles mate seems too think we are going to get into trouble for not having 'secure funding' which is apparently a rule.

Genuinely believe they're just making these rules up at this point.

 

[Tony’s Carp]

Bobbles mate seems too think we are going to get into trouble for not having 'secure funding' which is apparently a rule.

Yeah based on 18-19 dropping off I believe we should be under the 105 number but while I don’t fully understand this secure funding rule it seems to be the thing to worry about.

The more technical it all gets the more laughable it is to take points away.

 

[coollino]

Bobbles mate seems too think we are going to get into trouble for not having 'secure funding' which is apparently a rule.

oh god not him again

 

[neil999]

OK this is very tin foil hat...but could the government have lent on thr premier league because of our association with usmanov???


Prob not..

 

[Simon Buttle]

Well we did have secure funding until the UK government, completely nothing to do with the football club, decided that Russians were bad and needed exterminating.

We did but our wage bill was still way to high at that point and the spending had no plan and we were giving stupid contracts to average rubbish, we were always heading for a fall imo.

 

[coollino]

OK this is very tin foil hat...but could the government have lent on thr premier league because of our association with usmanov???


Prob not..

what at lunchtime truth bomb

 

[HalfTimeSayers]

Bobbles mate seems too think we are going to get into trouble for not having 'secure funding' which is apparently a rule.

So rules that are supposed to be to ensure clubs are run sustainably can be failed and result in punishment violently if you aren’t borrowing sustainably. Thats . And no doubt it’s true. Feels like a red card and 20 match ban for tripping yourself up and breaking your own leg.

 

[BlueandBald]

This is all on the fans.

The fans keeping Kenwright in power for as long as they did must hold some responsibility.

 

[Toffeeslam]

Have we been charged yet ?

 

[GoldenToffee]

Well we did have secure funding until the UK government, completely nothing to do with the football club, decided that Russians were bad and needed exterminating.

This is exactly the type of things that Super Silk would be all over if and when it's appealed to the highest courts.

There again, didn't we voluntarily cut ties with any Usmanov-linked companies like USM?

Maybe would have been better to see if it would have been forced on us instead.

In any case we were, naturally, hit hardest from any club due to the war and no surprise we couldn't recoup the same kind of deals in the economy after that.

 

[Ring master]

Bobbles mate seems too think we are going to get into trouble for not having 'secure funding' which is apparently a rule.

What even is it, surely that cant be a points deduction then, if that may be the charge we face - dont even know anymore

 

[ArtetaMoney]

Have we been charged yet ?

Just now - 3 points deducted every month for the next 25 years.

 

[neil999]

what at lunchtime truth bomb

I'm VERY clever

 

[Tony’s Carp]

OK this is very tin foil hat...but could the government have lent on thr premier league because of our association with usmanov???


Prob not..

If the PL want to end our association with Usmanov they could sign a piece of paper that’s on their desk.