Search results for query: *

Glad the Lennon contract is for only three years. Seems right for a player his age.

There are lots of ways to judge this window, from good to bad to everything in between, and I won't argue too much with whatever opinion people choose to take. I tend not to get too high or low since it's such a crap shoot anyway. The thing I can't get over is how big of a misstep it was for...

Here's a hypothetical question. If we were willing to pay £15 million to transfer Yarmolenko now (or some other player, doesn't matter who), would we also be willing to pay that much as a signing on fee next summer when his contract ends? If not, then why not?

The thing that's become most disappointing for me the past few weeks is the lack of optimism over everything Everton-related. I realize there are many, many reasons for this (board issues, transfer window inactivity, Kone's hair, etc.). Really, I get it. But it seems like a fair few fans have...

Well of course. Every team has to sign players at some point. I just shake my head when every transfer window some fans fall into the same habit of thinking every team that signs players is going to leap up the table. In recent years, we've seen Villa, Sunderland, QPR, Hull City, Norwich and...

Can't help but laugh at everyone who thinks that every time another team signs a player, it automatically makes them a better team. Sorry lads, that's not how it works.

Interesting that many on here seem more upset about Stoke getting a player instead of us, as opposed to being upset about us not getting Shaqiri specifically. My guess is that he wasn't a primary target, but after finding out he might be available, we tried to get him on loan. That seems...

One thing to remember... Even though we'd all like new signings in as early as possible to get prepared for the upcoming season, you don't spend millions of pounds on a transfer based on the affect they will have on the team over the course of a few weeks. You make a transfer based on the affect...

It does seem that some fans are more concerned with the spend rather than the quality of players that are being signed. If we had spent £15 million on Cleverly and Deulofeu, would that be better since we'd be further up the "spending tables" that everyone likes to point to? Of course not. On...

Funny how everyone keeps stating that "we're going with the same players that finished 11th last year" while ignoring the fact that they're also about the same players who finished 5th the year before. The biggest chance we have for success this year is for the established players from the squad...

So tell us, which players that are currently 16-18 years old are going to be the next superstars? Should be easy to tell us, right?