SNova
Player Valuation: £15m
She wasn't very impressive in my opinion either Nik, Caroline Lucas would have been far better.
Why do you keep calling me Nik. And yes she would have been, not only is she a better speaker, she's popular.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She wasn't very impressive in my opinion either Nik, Caroline Lucas would have been far better.
Look, the Lib Dem's are sexist.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/04/17/kill-all-men-lib-dem-activist-in-hate-speech-scandal/
For unskilled workers.
Why do you keep calling me Nik. And yes she would have been, not only is she a better speaker, she's popular.
I'm glad to see that the cabinet has not been reshuffled much, continuity is key at the moment......
The difference being, the Lib Dems didn't campaign exclusively on issues relating to gender and don't have a huge string of representatives being expelled for sexism.
The control measures were to simply ban all immigrants for the term of a parliament.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jan/07/ukip-immigration-policy-nigel-farage-migrants-ban
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/45...s-to-insist-on-his-immigration-ban-manifestos
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...not-stigmatise-wouldbe-migrants-10083830.html
http://www.workpermit.com/news/2014-01-14/ukip-leader-calls-for-5-year-bar-on-uk-immigration
Hobson's choice mate. Limited talent pool
Only the successful ones.Think Farage thought he was nailed on to win the seat he was going for, so got cocky saying if he didn't win he would resign. When he lost he resigned, but back tracked and said he was going to take some of the summer off, and then throw his name into the hat for the leadership of the party again.
At the end of the day, no matter what party they come from, all politicians are as dodgy as f uck, and full of bullshit.
We run one car between us - cheaper than the two we used to own and run. We ski almost every year. "Luxuries" means different things to different people though so sacrificing things you are happy to do without isn't really a sacrifice, is it? There's a thread elsewhere on the forum with people discussing their favourite aftershaves, and some people are talking about stuff that comes in at £100+ a bottle - I wouldn't spend money on that, for instance. Some people smoke, and I don't. There are too many examples to list. And what we are doing is investing in our child's future - if that's a sacrifice, then it's a bloody good one in my book.Each to their own and all that.
But are you telling me you'd be happy to sacrifice decent holiday, cars and other luxuries in life just to prove a point?
By the way Steven Woolfe, the UKIP immigration spokesman gets a lot of racial abuse by those who ironically campaign against racism.
I think that people who want to work should be able to find a job that can provide for a family without the need for handouts. I also think that child care should be subsidised so that working couples don't get punished for going back to work.So do you think that someone in the situation would be wiser to:
a) perhaps delay having children
b) maybe limit themselves to just the one
c) have them anyway, because they will work harder after the kids start arriving and will get paid more as a result - as per @the esk 's suggestion
d) "just wing it" - (can't recall which poster suggested that, will scroll back through the thread)
e) some other suggestion
I believe that each person's decision has an impact on society, and every right that anyone chooses to exercise (or not) should be considered in the light of that impact.