i had a dream i woke up and it was cut to 3 points
keep dreaming matt
keep dreaming matt
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We couldn't produce a single contemporaneous document to show any of the negotiations.No, we are saying that we were in advanced negotions for an earlier start to the payments and that should be a mitigating factor
“mitigation the assertion that it had been in negotiations with USM Services Limited to bring the agreement into force early, producing an accelerated annual receipt of £10 million commencing in FY 2022. No
agreement had been reached but negotiations were said to have reached an advanced stage.”
Yeah…. That’s also possible Isn’t it .
And whilst I think we will shrug off a 10 point deduction pretty well, I don’t see how we’d survive another 9 points. I just hope that if the price goes low enough other buyers will take a punt.
This is all on Moshiri, the man is a disgrace.
For some reason on the BBC website they had Luton on 9 points for a period of timeFFS, what is so hard about reading a League table?
Using energy to stop a takeover would be absolutely ridiculous when our owner is no longer able to fund the club. We need the takeover asap, so the club doesn't get into an even worse financial position and potentially enter admin.Yes. If we’d been hit with this last seaosn we’d have given down. Now? We’re only two points off safety.
People are rightly angry about it all, but I can’t help but think that the anger would be better focused on stopping 777. This sanction represents the past, the future is even scarier.
If we go into administration we would definitely lose more points. It's an automatic punishmentother buyers would deffo come in
but we surely won’t get docked another 9 points it’s f n inhumane
I agree that documentation is a problem, as discussed above with @BlueToff, but that is a different situation than you initially described it as which was “trying to claim money from an agreement that didn't start until 2025/26.”We couldn't produce a single contemporaneous document to show any of the negotiations.
Can 777 fund the club?Using energy to stop a takeover would be absolutely ridiculous when our owner is no longer able to fund the club. We need the takeover asap, so the club doesn't get into an even worse financial position and potentially enter admin.
And the punishment is excessive so the frustration and anger is justified.
And thisGotcha. The loss of USM was not deemed to be a mitigating factor. Mad really.
We don't know, but we know for sure that the current position is not sustainableCan 777 fund the club?
anyway.. argument for a different thread
And this
I have Tuesday off... going to have a wank.Any crumbs of positive news lads?
Dream harder!i had a dream i woke up and it was cut to 3 points
keep dreaming matt
The agreement was due to come into force from 25/26 because the probability is that would be our first full season at BMD. From an accounting point of view you can only account for things that are probable. It is a massive stretch to try and claim money for something that was still a possibility even more so trying to bring forward naming rights for a ground that is far from finished.I agree that documentation is a problem, as discussed above with @BlueToff, but that is a different situation than you initially described it as which was “trying to claim money from an agreement that didn't start until 2025/26.”