Jeez, is that a true fact? Incredible if so.Appointing the same ar5eholes (who handed us the deduction) to hear the appeal would suggest otherwise.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jeez, is that a true fact? Incredible if so.Appointing the same ar5eholes (who handed us the deduction) to hear the appeal would suggest otherwise.
I hope not mate and have not seen it if that's what it said.
"The Athletic has since been told the [Premier League] sanction framework was only meant to be used for Everton’s case. It is understood no such league-wide sanction policy is in the pipeline at the moment and that such a change would need to be communicated to clubs formally and via the handbook."
I would say that given the fact winning the cup involves a max of just 4 more games then I'd say go for it.. kock the FA cup on the head if we must.Yes, it would. But it's unlikely and we risk endangering our PL existence even more by opening these players up to injury with more non-PL games.
Think I read it on here, so who knows? Hopefully I’m wrong lolJeez, is that a true fact? Incredible if so.
Jeez, Karen Carney talking absolute nonsense on sky now “you can’t build a stadium whilst going through a pandemic”
I don’t think it is for the appeal but the same commission will hear any claims for compensation from the clubs who put a claim in within 28 days from the 17th November.Jeez, is that a true fact? Incredible if so.
When I'm in later, I will find the link.Have you still got this Phil ?
CheersWhen I'm later, I will find the link.
That's confusing too, what the hell has the panel got to do with no mark clubs wanting to sue us. Shouldn't the clubs just sue us and we see them in court? It's all baffling mate.I don’t think it is for the appeal but the same commission will hear any claims for compensation from the clubs who put a claim in within 28 days from the 17th November.
I think that’s where the confusion lies.
They'll need to do it another 25 times after this...and so will TNT sports and the BBC...and avoid crowd shots as much as they can.Have a history of using pre-recorded crowd noise too although they claim they will not use it today
Yes, that's going to be back heeled.I would say that given the fact winning the cup involves a max of just 4 more games then I'd say go for it.. kock the FA cup on the head if we must.
That isn't true it is a different panel.Appointing the same ar5eholes (who handed us the deduction) to hear the appeal would suggest otherwise.
My idea was to get the PL commission report, shred it and ticker tape the ground with it.We should have flown a plane over Goodison and dropped 40,000 "Premier League = Corrupt" leaflets over the stadium at the 10-minute mark, turning the pitch into a tickertape blizzard a la the River Plate Stadium 1978.
It gets worse…the PL were in secret discussions with the aggrieved clubs back in March and it was agreed that if an independent commission found Everton guilty of PSR breaches they could sue but that info was embargoed until the Commission made their decision.That's confusing too, what the hell has the panel got to do with no mark clubs wanting to sue us. Shouldn't the clubs just sue us and we see them in court? It's all baffling mate.