Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

6 + 2 Point Deductions

I don't think it can be overturned as we stupidly admitted our guilt so we have to face a penalty.

The points deduction could be added to - 12 points as the PL wanted
The points deduction could remain the same - 10 points - the appeal case finds we have no argument.
The points deduction could be reduced - The appeal finds we have some grounds that the amount of points was too harsh.
The points deduction could be wiped out - Very unlikely and they fine our "wealthy" owner. And when they say "owner" they mean the club.
Appeals on harshness of the sentence happen all the time. who knows what we admitted.. could have been as simple as
we went over and heres why.. New stadium, covid, Ukraine war, player G..
 

I thought it was a standard sanction? That would explain why absolutely everyone voted against it.
Supposedly voted against it so commissions could exercise flexibility based on cooperation, mitigating circumstances, and I guess deliberate breaches versus stupid/lazy breaches.

So we cooperarate, get found not to have deliberately breached or attempted to mislead, and have the majority of our mitigations slapped into the weeds, and the largest sporting penalty in PL history.

Making it all up as they go.
 
Marvellous. So we need these most recent accounts to be £20m better in terms of PSR calculated loss compared to the year that drops out of the calculation. You would hope that’s not an issue given the recent austerity and that oldest period that drops off was presumably a thumping loss?

the oldest period I think was the averaging of Covid years, so it would be a 2 year loss. Hopefully that makes a difference. I just hope that they haven't been disregarding the Stadium interest, or whatever they did, since.
 

lol lol lol



A story about process and nothing else. Just means they have quickened it so clubs are punished for breaches in the next season rather than two down the line.

Everton are the headline but it applies to everyone and all clubs COULD still receive a PSR sanction this season.
 
Is this a new thing that you now submit one years stuff anyway? as whats happened to the 3 year cycle rubbish. The 10point thing is part of the 3 year cycle we got the deduction for isnt it. so no way can we have had another 3 years already and you cant just add a year on to the previous 2 to keep bringing it to the 3rd year like the 3rd year is a rolling year - it has to go for example 2018-2021 & 2021 to 2024


Its all rubbish and just headline making for the sake of it, as every team has the same problem
 
Last edited:
Marvellous. So we need these most recent accounts to be £20m better in terms of PSR calculated loss compared to the year that drops out of the calculation. You would hope that’s not an issue given the recent austerity and that oldest period that drops off was presumably a thumping loss?
Far as I’m aware it’s 18/19 that drops off in the latest calculation and from memory that was 100m plus loss (and pre Covid deductions) so it’s the biggest culprit.

If the current calculation is 20m overspend then we’d just need to be 20m better off than 18/19 which given the trajectory of our results should be achieved.
 

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top