Osamabindiesel
Player Valuation: £70m
We have DorisLawyers, they have Lawyers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We have DorisLawyers, they have Lawyers.
Makes a cracking tuna salad, thinks an objection is something you stick on a cream cake.We have Doris
No Purslow was already on Board - pretty sure Martin Broughton was RBS choice.Yes, the court ordered that Purslow was installed on the board to ensure a sale was made. They sold to FSG for £300m, which was a rounded figure of exactly what RBS, Purslows employers, were owed.
I think the main complaint is the severity of the punishment... it's a punishment worse than you ger for going into administration, which is basically telling your creditors you can't pay them your staff/players don't get paid.. we spent less than 5 million too much per season over 4 seasons and were hit with this ridiculous punishment.. if you don't agree that the punishment was far too harsh for the crime then I believe you are a kopite on here fishing for a reaction.Mate, the club acknowledged wrongdoing (breaking a rule). The club ignored multiple warnings from the league, and just continued. I'm not a fan of the PL, but we have to accept our part in this, no matter how uncomfortable it may be. Not long ago, a lot of people on here were cheering on us breaking the P&S/FFP rules - the same are now complaining why we're being punished.
Im convinced we had no legal team.
A year 1 Lawyer would have presented a vastly different case.
Rule 1, never admit guilt, EVER.
Im convinced we had no legal team.
A year 1 Lawyer would have presented a vastly different case.
Rule 1, never admit guilt, EVER.
What is not long ago, you have seen the protests to get change how the club is run. Have not seen a single blue be happy we have broke the rules, we have all accepted the club is guilty but how is 10 points fair that is the point.Mate, the club acknowledged wrongdoing (breaking a rule). The club ignored multiple warnings from the league, and just continued. I'm not a fan of the PL, but we have to accept our part in this, no matter how uncomfortable it may be. Not long ago, a lot of people on here were cheering on us breaking the P&S/FFP rules - the same are now complaining why we're being punished.
Maybe because pleading guilty normal results in a reduced punishment.That is what I don't understand. Why did we ever admit it? Let them prove it.
Not really the case....years ago I smashed the telly playing football in the house with my brother,and thought if I owned up and begged clemency I'd be fine.Maybe because pleading guilty normal results in a reduced punishment.
Yea but if you didnt own up he'd have leathered you with the steel side of steel toe boots.Not really the case....years ago I smashed the telly playing football in the house with my brother,and thought if I owned up and begged clemency I'd be fine.
I still got leathered with the rubber side of a pair of slippers.
I should have stuck to my original story and said it was a ghost.Yea but if you didnt own up he'd have leathered you with the steel side of steel toe boots.
Only in a Court of Law. Whatever type of quasi tribunal this was doesn't have to comply with any of these mitigation type rulesMaybe because pleading guilty normal results in a reduced punishment.
City have arranged a date for 18 months time. In about 15 months they'll say they need more time to prepare, and so on ad infinitum. If it ever gets heard it will have been so long since the offences that they'll say it's not worth it. Either that or they'll leave for a Super League or there will be a new league agreement that means no penalties for past offences.I think thats the reason City are so flippant. How that is no a direct link to FFP i'll never know. Its cooking the books basically.
Though tbh the way the premier league have behaved towards Everton im half hoping City continue to tell them to get lost.