6 + 2 Point Deductions

[trueblue84]

Basically, the PL saying they couldn’t care less about the players welfare (even though at that point he wasn’t charged and never actually was anyway) and that we should have sued him for 10m in losses.

Surely we could have sued the FA for the losses instead? Considering they are the ones that banned him despite him never being charged.

It's also ironic as the fa is probably as prolific a paedophile ring as the BBC.

 

[wellillwill]

It's hard to escape the conclusion that the real mistake we have made is being utterly transparent.

 

[roydo]

Carragher completely clueless to who player x is the bellend

Player X name is still under a high court injunction in the UK.

 

[BirkenheadBlue]

Donate to The 1878s - Atmosphere fund, organized by The1878s Fan Group

We have plans in motion regarding banners and flags against the Independent Commission’… The1878s Fan Group needs your support for The 1878s - Atmosphere fund

t.co

Incredible progress towards that target

 

[Drico]

It's hard to escape the conclusion that the real mistake we have made is being utterly transparent.

And incompetent.

Actually, just incompetent.

 

[Shibbywiggles]

To go from a point behind Luton to a last day relegation fight things will have had to go seriously wrong.

yeah, I think one or two of these clubs will do better than they have done so far but we had 8 more points after 12 games which include us playing the first five with a complete ragtag set up and no striker for the first three!

 

[Blue83]

That wasn’t what was up for dispute, if you read the report it basically says it’s “an everyday work occurrence.”

View attachment 235657

Inflation is a part of everday life though and the War has nothing to do with us breaching P&S in 20/21, I'm not sure why it's even mentioned given 2022 is not 2020 or 2021

 

[Brendan Janus]

Does our playing staff and coaching team have to do interviews with the premier league now ?

Should tell em to eff off !

 

[Tommy Chong]

What a joke.

 

[Nymzee]

Player X name is still under a high court injunction in the UK.

But we still all know who it means.

 

[MikeH72]

So 10 points AND all the other clubs can sue us?

Oh, we dead.

What? No.

 

[Tony’s Carp]

Carragher completely clueless to who player x is the bellend

It's a bit of a hospital pass to be fair as legally he wouldn't be allowed to name the player or go into any detail about the situation given player x has never been charged with a crime.

 

[roydo]

But we still all know who it means.

So what? Try publishing it or broadcasting it.

 

[maccavennie]

Player X name is still under a high court injunction in the UK.

Yes I know, it was him basically going on as if player x was just a player we couldn't sell for a certain price due to covid and said every team was in the same boat. They weren't though as no other team had a player x problem like we did.

 

[NathDogg]

To be fair Sky have already got Carragher banging the drum for us on how harsh it is and talkSPORT have had Simon Jordan doing the same.

The media aren’t out to get us because we get far more viewers, listeners, clicks than anyone from the championship who would replace us but I’m starting to feel now that the premier league is!

I swear it’s because we were most vocal after the scabs tried to kill footy, and we made an absolute joke of the league and uefa with our stance compared to theres.

They still didn’t listen to us mind.