I seriously am not, but I have no choice on here because any mention of something such as key passes is met with derision. Much less pulling out anything more nuanced than that.
Erling Haaland. Your ultimate stat junkie love affair.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I seriously am not, but I have no choice on here because any mention of something such as key passes is met with derision. Much less pulling out anything more nuanced than that.
Yes, but my love of Haaland is more than just raw goals, trust me on that.Erling Haaland. Your ultimate stat junkie love affair.
Again mate I see more than goals and assists. There aren't a ton of goals in football so going just off of them will cause you to miss things. That means getting into positions to score is very important as only constantly getting to those spots, and getting the ball there, will create goals. When you are playing as sporadically as he is the end product will sometimes not come, but he is still doing the other part of it, and he did it here, to suggest if he actually did play a lot it would come around.
None of our other players do those things at a high level.
Also in his whole career he has played like 1800 top flight minutes between here and Germany and has 6 goals and 5 assists, which isn't bad.
For comparison Bernard has 4 and 5 in 3000 minutes, Walcott has 9 and 7 with us in 4200 minutes and Bolasie had 2 and 4 in 1800 minutes. That's all in the league btw. Cup and Europe gets weird with quality of opponent considerations.
Again the scarcity of goals in this sport means to me that if all you focus on is that you'll miss things. It is how we ended up with Sandro for example. But that's a philosophical thing so I'm not going to spend time convincing you to change your mind.Getting in the positions and not finishing it off with a goal or an assist is worthless as far as putting points on the board goes.
You ain't winning matches because your players get into good positions but do nothing with it.
His stats would be dire if not for his purple patch during the RB loan. I'm not even bothered about judging his time in Germany because it's a completely different league and he never did anything worthwhile for us in the Prem.
I'm fine with saying that Bernard, Walcott and Bolasie don't have good enough end product but I saw nothing from Lookman in a blue shirt that convinced me he was any better, nevermind to the level which you want to rate him at better than those others.
If he was better than them and wanted to stay here then he'd be starting matches. He wasn't and he didn't and now he's looking for a 3rd club in 3 years and that's solely down to him.
Again the scarcity of goals in this sport means to me that if all you focus on is that you'll miss things. It is how we ended up with Sandro for example. But that's a philosophical thing so I'm not going to spend time convincing you to change your mind.
I don't rate Bernard because he is an attacker who doesn't shoot and who plays a lot of passes from more dangerous areas to less dangerous areas. I also think the build up stuff that people praise him for a lot is overblown, he is fine at it, but not good enough to make up for what he doesn't do in the attacking third.And yet you don't rate Bernard for this very reason right?
I seriously am not, but I have no choice on here because any mention of something such as key passes is met with derision. Much less pulling out anything more nuanced than that.
You're saying you actually value stats? I'll add you to the shortlist if that is the case.Well its is pretentious nonsense... (I guess I am one of the 7...)
You're saying you actually value stats? I'll add you to the shortlist if that is the case.
If you care to elaborate, I'm interested, but I don't understand what you mean.I actually do value stats but I value them to the extent that I find they can not be used to judge footballers...