Kovacic is on the verge of leaving Chelsea for Man city so a space for Onana could be open very soon.
Aren’t they signing Caicedo?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kovacic is on the verge of leaving Chelsea for Man city so a space for Onana could be open very soon.
Contract means nothing if a player wants away.We’ve got no chance of actually building a team if any decent player we have wants to leave. He’s on a 5yr contract so keep him.
Not necessarily. Think they got quoted a lot more than it would take to sign OnanaAren’t they signing Caicedo?
Or if you sign good players people will buy them off you.Hilarious how we signed a load of players and couldn’t get rid of them. Chelsea signed loads of players, how now got rid of them all go Saudi and got big fee’s for all of them. And they will avoid any ffp issues because all the new players they signed are all on longer contracts. It’s almost like it’s meant to be for these top 6 clubs. Everything goes right for them.
He is supposed to be a holding midfielder (as confirmed by our resident expert @Zatara ).What do we think his absolute ceiling (fully developed to his fullest potential) is? £90m??
Someone offers us north of £65m we should bite their hands off and invest in 2 or 3 players with the same potential as Onana’s was at Lille. Then you mitigate for things like injuries etc by spreading your outlay.
He is supposed to be a holding midfielder (as confirmed by our resident expert @Zatara ).
The best holding midfielder by a mile is Rhodri. City paid £62 million for him.
Do you honestly think AO has the potential to be better than him ?
I don't
A fee of anything over £50 million would be fantastic.
That is his position for the national team and tbh he does look better there but then he is playing with much better players around him.He is supposed to be a holding midfielder (as confirmed by our resident expert @Zatara ).
The best holding midfielder by a mile is Rhodri. City paid £62 million for him.
Do you honestly think AO has the potential to be better than him ?
I don't
A fee of anything over £50 million would be fantastic.
Ahh, I've missed the days of Belgian internationals moaning about being at Everton, the second they're away from the club. Then ramping up the fans when back at Goodison.Mirror quoting this Belgian paper today
LIVE WINTERSTAGES. Gent oefent tegen Roemeense Cluj, Westerlo speelt in extremis gelijk tegen Duitse derdeklasser
Winterstop in de Jupiler Pro League. Dus zoeken haast alle Belgische voetbalclubs warmere oorden op voor een winterstage. Mis niets van de belangrijkste gebeurtenissen op deze stages via onze live.www.nieuwsblad.be
I've repeated it 100x over the years on here. But I really do wish we'd "moneyball" our strategy.What do we think his absolute ceiling (fully developed to his fullest potential) is? £90m??
Someone offers us north of £65m we should bite their hands off and invest in 2 or 3 players with the same potential as Onana’s was at Lille. Then you mitigate for things like injuries etc by spreading your outlay.
I think this sums up the problem with Everton. If a club wants our top players, we should make them pay.Not necessarily. Think they got quoted a lot more than it would take to sign Onana
Yeah I mean Mendy, Ziech and Koulabaily haven’t exactly set the world alight at Chelsea.Or if you sign good players people will buy them off you.
Should get you in mate. Seem to know what you’re on about.I've repeated it 100x over the years on here. But I really do wish we'd "moneyball" our strategy.
1. Buy in a player, explain we're a stepping stone to a European club. (dont cry over this, they don't have a love for the club). He'll get the move, if he gives 100% every game and helps the team.
2. Sell the player for an inflated fee, he's performed well and top clubs want him. They have the money, we have a young talent.
3. Buy in 2 or 3 new players, showing them our strategy. Players become eager to move to us to help them grow and get the move they want.
4. Sell the 2 or 3 players over time and repeat.
There's so many reasons why this could and should work.
1, We firstly fall in line with FFP and report healthy finances.
2, We gain a reputation (like Brighton) for producing players and it's expected that teams will pay big money for our talent.
3, We develop relationships with the top clubs. Allowing us to pick their best of the rest.
4, Players actually want to join our club. Right now, why would you? If the club moved to this strategy, you'd have players desperate to join, all seeing how other talents got their move.
5, Each season we improve slightly. This isn't a quick win. But over time, we move into the top half, then begin to knock on the door of Europe. At this point, our talent goes for far bigger fees and we attract a higher quality of player. Eventually, players will no longer see us as a stepping stone, but a club to move to for Europe etc.
There's so much more to it and I've waffled on previously. But god I wish we could look at it and work on it. I feel it's the only viable strategy to us ever becoming a force again. Spending big didn't work. Fans wanting players to stay forever doesn't work. Old cast off's doesn't work. The academy doesn't work. This strategy is screaming to be implemented.
It doesn't work when you have a kopite signing players from Leeds.I've repeated it 100x over the years on here. But I really do wish we'd "moneyball" our strategy.
1. Buy in a player, explain we're a stepping stone to a European club. (dont cry over this, they don't have a love for the club). He'll get the move, if he gives 100% every game and helps the team.
2. Sell the player for an inflated fee, he's performed well and top clubs want him. They have the money, we have a young talent.
3. Buy in 2 or 3 new players, showing them our strategy. Players become eager to move to us to help them grow and get the move they want.
4. Sell the 2 or 3 players over time and repeat.
There's so many reasons why this could and should work.
1, We firstly fall in line with FFP and report healthy finances.
2, We gain a reputation (like Brighton) for producing players and it's expected that teams will pay big money for our talent.
3, We develop relationships with the top clubs. Allowing us to pick their best of the rest.
4, Players actually want to join our club. Right now, why would you? If the club moved to this strategy, you'd have players desperate to join, all seeing how other talents got their move.
5, Each season we improve slightly. This isn't a quick win. But over time, we move into the top half, then begin to knock on the door of Europe. At this point, our talent goes for far bigger fees and we attract a higher quality of player. Eventually, players will no longer see us as a stepping stone, but a club to move to for Europe etc.
There's so much more to it and I've waffled on previously. But god I wish we could look at it and work on it. I feel it's the only viable strategy to us ever becoming a force again. Spending big didn't work. Fans wanting players to stay forever doesn't work. Old cast off's doesn't work. The academy doesn't work. This strategy is screaming to be implemented.