A lot of words here but it’s pretty simple, he’s bang average to the rest of world but for some reason, you lauded this guy like seeing prime Zidane week in and out. Made every excuse under the sun and blaming everyone else for frankly average performances
During a recent Belgium friendly you gave him a 7 and in his match highlights included ‘celebrated a goal with lukaku’ just brilliant.
Throwing £100m+ fees around all season. Wanted by Arsenal, Chelsea, Barcelona, Man Utd, Bayern Munich, 1970’s Brazil etc . The fact he’s gone for £50m to Villa, of all teams, is pure proof you’re deluded and talk absolute crap.
1: Just taking the £33mil and the £55mil sale price (per Bobble) we've made 65% revenue on the fees.
2: The "excuses" have been:
A: He's 20-22 years old
B: He's being played out of position
C: He's rarely been used in a defensive role
D: The team 'strategy' isnt helping midfielders
Are they "excuses" or facts?
3: All of those elite teams (and more) have been linked by reputable media sources. You're talking as if i'm making this up lol
4: The benchmark fees of players actually used in defensive midfield positions e.g Rice, Caicedo, Lavia and even Ugarte in comparison to Onana's fee highlight a lower than market fee. However, when many others have posted stats he is clearly up there and superior to most comparables in the league.
For a player who is "terrible" and you clearly HATE I'd say the joke is on you.
MY club has turned over 65% revenue generation on a player you deem to be useless.
MY club has received a club record transfer fee from a champions league team for him.
MY club has seen one of the most respected DOFs (not including Roma fans view) and Managers make that record offer...
...but yet YOU think he's rubbish.
YOU prefer to make obnoxious posts and wish we'd sold him for a loss just so you'd be right.
YOU are the problem here, not me.
He needed to adapt to the system and not the other way around.
All I read is that the national side and his club side need to build around him to see him at his "potential"
For us fundamentally...
He wasn't a better DM than Gana
Wasn't a consistent CM than Garner
Wasn't a better attacking threat than Doucoure.
I don't mind him. You'll probably see a more complete player in 2-3 years time. Could've stayed with us, didn't want to. Moved him on.
Not his game to "adapt to the system" though is it. Look at Veron at United?
Gana is classed as a DM by many here but is he? He is effective by running around alot as a 'hunter' and 'press machine'. He's not a DM who sits back and mops up. How would Gana do as in that role = terribly as its not his game.
The same can be said for wanting Onana to play like Gana.
Tbf he has a point, Dyche has misused both Onana and Garner last season. Onana has been tasked with what is ultimately Garners better position/role and Dyche has seen fit to make Garner the more defensive player which is really Onana's best position.
1000% correct. Its not only the starting position as a CM where he's misused, its also the strategy of Dyche using the wrong players defensively, box-to-box and sitting back/pressing.
The amount of times Gana or Garner were tasked to play more defensively when Onana is the only DM of the 3 was mind blowing.
"We are using Onana in a variety of positions to improve his all-round game"
--both Lampard and Dyche said this.
Why not just use him in the correct position and role? Its utter madness.
We'll see Villa use him correctly.