2019/20 Andre Gomes

[marnie]

LET ME GUESS KIERAN ?

That's why I have the little BLERT on ignore.Try it out it's free lol

 

[blulouie]

When the anger goes, you will all see how blameless he is.

This is so wrong Friend.

 

[Tipp blue]

Son apologies.. why? Some would have you believe he did nothing wrong.. an apology is an admission of guilt.

 

[Deleted member 38674]

Son apologies.. why? Some would have you believe he did nothing wrong.. an apology is an admission of guilt.

It could be an acknowledgement of sorrow and regret, rather than of guilt.

It was an accident. Coleman and most blues I’ve spoke to know it.

 

[SantaClausisanEvertonian]

Seeing as we should all be forgiving the blameless and 'not that type of player' Son, despite his reckless and premeditated lunge at Gomes, why don't we throw a testimonial for him, just to show what a nicey nice club we are?
We could invite Jimmy Case as a guest of honour too, thereby killing two birds with one stone so to speak.
If you think about it, he must have done nothing wrong if he cried and was 'devastated' by what happened.
Twitter has been the epitome of verbal diarrhoea on 'sympathy' and 'respect' for Son since Sunday evening. We would all do well to remember that, despite the different opinions on the matter, we have a great footballer sidelined for months as a direct result of a professional foul, whilst the perpetrator is living it up in the Champions League.

 

[blulouie]

It could be an acknowledgement of sorrow and regret, rather than of guilt.

It was an accident. Coleman and most blues I’ve spoke to know it.

Apology=
A regretful acknowledgement of an offence or failure.

Wrong again bozo.

You just dont seem to learn do you.

 

[blue76]

It could be an acknowledgement of sorrow and regret, rather than of guilt.

It was an accident. Coleman and most blues I’ve spoke to know it.

This is what's wrong with where the fan base is headed.

 

[Tipp blue]

It could be an acknowledgement of sorrow and regret, rather than of guilt.

It was an accident. Coleman and most blues I’ve spoke to know it.

Well Coleman and most blues you've spoken to obviously don't know the rules on a tackle from behind.. look up the rules on it and come back with a sensible argument referring to the rules on why Son shouldn't have been punished.

 

[Deleted member 38674]

Seeing as we should all be forgiving the blameless and 'not that type of player' Son, despite his reckless and premeditated lunge at Gomes, why don't we throw a testimonial for him, just to show what a nicey nice club we are?
We could invite Jimmy Case as a guest of honour too, thereby killing two birds with one stone so to speak.
If you think about it, he must have done nothing wrong if he cried and was 'devastated' by what happened.
Twitter has been the epitome of verbal diarrhoea on 'sympathy' and 'respect' for Son since Sunday evening. We would all do well to remember that, despite the different opinions on the matter, we have a great footballer sidelined for months as a direct result of a professional foul, whilst the perpetrator is living it up in the Champions League.

I don’t think anyone has forgot about Gomes

Apology=
A regretful acknowledgement of an offence or failure.

Wrong again bozo.

You just dont seem to learn do you.

That’s one definition of it sure. Doesn’t differ immensely from the one I put forth.

Let’s use your definition then, perhaps he’s acknowledging his failure to safely complete the tackle.

That would be an admission of guilt, without acknowledging malice or intent wouldn’t it?

 

[Deleted member 38674]

We'll Coleman and most blues you've spoken to obviously don't know the rules on a tackle from behind.. look up the rules on it and come back with a sensible argument referring to the rules on why Son shouldn't have been punished.

Coleman, most blues and the panel of officials who overturned the decision - don’t know the rules.

Fair enough.

 

[TheBigIguana]

It could be an acknowledgement of sorrow and regret, rather than of guilt.

It was an accident. Coleman and most blues I’ve spoke to know it.

You don't get to intentionally foul someone and claim it is an accident when they get injured even if it is much more of a sever injury than you ever imagined you could cause.

 

[blulouie]

I don’t think anyone has forgot about Gomes


That’s one definition of it sure. Doesn’t differ immensely from the one I put forth.

Let’s use your definition then, perhaps he’s acknowledging his failure to safely complete the tackle.

That would be an admission of guilt, without acknowledging malice or intent wouldn’t it?

Why do you constantly do this ?

It cant be any clearer , its an admission of guilt whichever way you wanna dress it up.

But carry on fella , you're making me look good.

 

[Bungle]

Poor tackle worthy of a yellow card, emotion took over and the ref mistakenly changed it to red, so it was rightly rescinded.

I don't give a toss about Son and his feelings and how it affects him, I'm just hopeful that Gomes makes a full and speedy recovery.

 

[TheBigIguana]

There seems to be this idea that you shouldn't take into account how bad someone got injured in deciding between yellow and red and I honestly don't understand that. It feels obvious to me that causing a bad injury could be a sign that the tackle was more dangerous.

 

[Tipp blue]

Coleman, most blues and the panel of officials who overturned the decision - don’t know the rules.

Fair enough.

Not what I asked you, I requested you come to me with a sensible argument referring to the rules of the game as to why Son should not have been sent off.