Son has to live with the consequences of his actions, he had zero intent to injure Gomes but had 100% intent to foul him - so there is no surprise that there is so much conflict of opinion with regards to this.
If there is any positive to come from this extremely bleak moment, it may make players more aware about deliberately fouling people in overly aggressive manners. Weirdly, one of the first things to come to mind after this incident was one Andre Gomes was involved in last season when he quite brutally and very deliberately stamped on the ankle of Alexander Mitrovic.
I have no doubt that Gomes was completely wound up by Mitrovic's antics during the game and it was sheer petulance that made him think "I'm going to leave one on this idiot", but he could have easily done more damage to Mitrovic than intended - which should maybe give the people on here who are giving Son both barrels a little reminder that the type of 'rush of blood' moments that Son did are not too far away from being committed by our own players, including the one who got so unfortunately injured on Sunday.
Son has to live with the guilt of what his actions have caused. I don't believe that the challenge in general was worthy of a red card, because it was more cynical than violent, but in isolation sometimes you just can't look past the outcome of a decision you make.
The wider media campaign placing Son as a victim is something I take issue with however - there is only one victim in this piece and absolutely nobody should lose sight of that. Sadly, it seems the non-Everton media fraternity already have...