We need more Gordons not to be getting rid.
Gana back and a decent forward cover for DCL, whilst keeping Gordon is what we need.
oh don’t half of here wanna sell him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We need more Gordons not to be getting rid.
Gana back and a decent forward cover for DCL, whilst keeping Gordon is what we need.
It's a serious call for the club to make, and I'd be interested to know who'll have the final say. My first reaction was to hope that he'll stay, but then if you'd told me in 2016 that Barkley would end up leaving for the amount he did, I'd never have believed it.
I properly rate him, but perhaps this is the peak of his value. I don't know.
Take their hands off.30 + Gallagher + Broja seems more appropriate
Like they've come in with their first bid we go the other way we meet in the middle with a fair wedge and Broja. Unless we try it we'll never know how desperate they are for him.Chelsea arent going for that
There are an awful lot of other players we really needed to move on so its disappointing that there's no movement on that and instead we may lose Gordon.We absolutely could Tim, but we just wouldn't be able to spend another £40-50m in the market if we did keep him. We'd be restricted to limited spending/loans.
Which, btw, I'd be fine with, as I think we'd still have enough to stay clear of danger.
But I'd be a lot more confident if we were able to spend another £50m.
See your point on MGW though I don't think it's right to write him off as 'not a goalscorer at this level'. For one he is more of a versatile attacking mid/second striker type so we wouldn't be wanting him as the striker, and he does have a lot of talent. But yes, £40m would be too much.
if only the former Barca and Bayern man - I mean, Preston and New York man had a bigger rolodex of contacts eh... Imagine the possibilities.Dendoncker, Gibbs White, Traore.. he’ll have an exhaustive list of Wolves rejects.
Thing is like we hadn't sold our best players for 3 years before this season Matty and we were still crap
FWIW, Gordon isn't one of our best players, he has a lot of work to do. But, we do not absolutely HAVE to sell.
However, if Chelsea want to offer £50m for a lad with 4 PL goals, one of which was an inadvertent clip of his heal off a Richarlison shot, and what - 2 assists? - then honestly, we have to seriously think about it don't we?
EverythingWhat would you change in the deal?
I think generally he has performed well all things considered but ultimately his end product has left a lot to be desired.I'm not on the fence mate. He should go if those figures are made.
The point is more that people seem to underplay his performance level.
There are an awful lot of other players we really needed to move on so its disappointing that there's no movement on that and instead we may lose Gordon.
We are dealing with Chelsea so we need to push them as far as we can. We need to be prepared to hold out for the very best possible deal and use the precedent they set this summer in our favour.
I think we've put ourselves in a bad position with the daft McNeil deal. That money needed to go on a goalscorer. Now we have no goals and may need to sell ANOTHER important first team player to fix it.
Its pretty depressing stuff. Especially the fact our future would then be in the hands of the recruitment team and I have next to no faith in them.
I meant permanent for Broja loan for GallagherI thought we have room for one domestic loan and one international. If that is the case that would scupper that, nice as it sounds.
Fastwere going backwards
We need more Gordons not to be getting rid.
Gana back and a decent forward cover for DCL, whilst keeping Gordon is what we need.
I want both.
For FFP scam wise.
60m Gordon
30m each for their boys
Take it or go pester somebody else, would be my stance.
That's fine, I see the point.it sends out all the wrong messages mate as an actual club. sell your best players not build a team around them