Glasshalffull
Player Valuation: £10m
...... and then when we're 4-0 down after 20 minutes, and Gordon sent off after giving away 2 penalties, presumably we'd put Coleman back on.I'd play him at right back for a while.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...... and then when we're 4-0 down after 20 minutes, and Gordon sent off after giving away 2 penalties, presumably we'd put Coleman back on.I'd play him at right back for a while.
I think Loftus cheek at Chelsea is a good example of not writing a player offi mean there are plenty of young players who don't need time
how much time do you give him
does Haaland need time?
does Jude Bellingham need time?
anthony at man utd is only a year older than him
before you know it he will 29 years old and people will be saying he still needs more time
Haaland and Bellingham are unfairI think Loftus cheek at Chelsea is a good example of not writing a player off
It's a crazy comparison, he is never gonna be those levels, but he can still be a good player.. Its too black and whiteHaaland and Bellingham are unfair
both super talented, managed well by their teams. I think for only the last year we have a set up that is finally starting to manage young players well again.
It's a crazy comparison, he is never gonna be those levels, but he can still be a good player.. Its too black and white
Watif a club values that player at 80 mil then he should be at those levels no?
Needs to be on the bench for a couple of games after his suspensionI was at the game on Sunday and he contributed nothing at all, not a decisive pass, not a run at their defence, not a shot on goal.
Stop making excuses for him, he's not 17, I hope he turns into a world class player, but he is offering nothing currently.
He is either believing his own hype or had his head turned by the pre season nonsense.
He got bullied on Sunday, by Utd, men against a boy, he has to up his game or shouldn't be anywhere near a starting place.
so we rejected 60 mil for a good player then?
We didnt thoso we rejected 60 mil for a good player then?
i would have sold him for 10 mil
VAR still allows dives to stand and dives outside the box aren't reviewed and still matter. If you don't dive you're choosing to be a worse player. That's the game.Amazing.
Diving although scum, servex its purpose before VAR, now it's utterly pointless and has a negative affect anyway because even if you genuinely have been fouled if you have the rep of a diver you won't get key decisions.
He's the same age as Onana and deserves the same patience while he is developing as a player.I was at the game on Sunday and he contributed nothing at all, not a decisive pass, not a run at their defence, not a shot on goal.
Stop making excuses for him, he's not 17, I hope he turns into a world class player, but he is offering nothing currently.
He is either believing his own hype or had his head turned by the pre season nonsense.
He got bullied on Sunday, by Utd, men against a boy, he has to up his game or shouldn't be anywhere near a starting place.
De Bruyne alsoI think Loftus cheek at Chelsea is a good example of not writing a player off
Your not a worse player if you don't dive at all. I hate to see it and the sooner its out of the game the better. Its blatant cheatingVAR still allows dives to stand and dives outside the box aren't reviewed and still matter. If you don't dive you're choosing to be a worse player. That's the game.
You are though. You'll lose possession more and draw fewer fouls. Both of these are negatives.Your not a worse player if you don't dive at all. I hate to see it and the sooner its out of the game the better. Its blatant cheating