I havent made any slur, I've merely asked for evidence.
The club have not officially stated she was put in a headlock, but it has been leaked by them. I am asking for the club to either provide evidence for the allegation, or withdraw it.
You have stated that the its insane- akin to climate change denialism to suggest it may not have happened. Well climate change has thousands or experts, who have studied it over 50 years providing evidence to show it is.
I am asking you now, to provide evidence the headlock happened. If you cannot, you need to apologise for making unsubstantiated slurs.
And yes, I'm sure DBB is lovely, and yes we would all agree that nobody should come under physical attack. That's why it's really important that the alleged attack is substantiated, rather than you just assuming it happened, without seemingly any evidence to support it.
You cant just go round making allegations without evidence. So without the ludicrous tirade of irrelevance, please substantiate your assertion that DBB was placed in a headlock. There were up to 40,000 people in the area, so if it occurred that will be pretty simple to do. Or perhaps a police number for this assault?
Spot on. There is a legal tenet: He who asserts must prove.
We await the proof.
There are certain things concerning the alleged episode that just do not add up (in support of what you are saying, catcher):
1 Why wasn't the incident reported immediately to the Police, as this would appear to be a
prima facie case of assault?; Is there an actual crime report with the Police? If so, when was it lodged?
2 Why didn't the person assaulted cry out for witnesses?
3 Question: was she alone? If not, what have ALL of the witnesses done in the intervening period? Nothing? I very much doubt that she would be alone in the main stand, if that is where the alleged assault took place.
4 Why wait from Tuesday 3rd January (the night of the Brighton game) until just before the Southampton game to announce the incident?
5 Given that it has been stated elsewhere on here by other members that the ground is covered by CCTV, where is the CCTV video evidence to back up the claim of assault?
Given that one of my duties when I was in work was criminal investigative work, the above 5 points come immediately to mind. They have to be the initial basis for any investigation. Also, the basic ground rules of investigation, ABC. Accept nothing; Believe no one; Check everything. You start with an open mind and a blank page. Has the club done that? I don't believe it has.
At present, (and this is only my conjecture) it appears that the allegation of assault only came out once it had been announced that protests against the board would be made at the Southampton game. An adjunct to my previous paragraph is that there is a logical pattern/path to everything - nothing is illogical. The protest announcement, the claim of alleged assault, the 'security' advice to the Board members not to attend, the empty seats in the Directors box, there is the logical path, friends...