2018/19 Cenk Tosun

[ADT]

Get rid besiktas would take him back

 

[Frang]

Get rid besiktas would take him back

Not on 120k a week they wont

Hey let's resign a player we were paying 8000k a week, a year ago and pay him 120k a week on a long contract

As

If

 

[Zatara]

Get rid besiktas would take him back

Not for the money we need...£18.4mil to break even based on his contract.

I think he will be loaned till summer then it drops to a more manageable £16mil

 

[Goat]

Not for the money we need...£18.4mil to break even based on his contract.

I think he will be loaned till summer then it drops to a more manageable £16mil

Yes but a deal with Bestikas would be different Zat.

We still havent paid them all the fee.

 

[messymascot]

Not for the money we need...£18.4mil to break even based on his contract.

I think he will be loaned till summer then it drops to a more manageable £16mil

Who would take him on loan though? I agree we should keep until the summer but I would use him as a sub when plan a doesn't work.

 

[Goat]

Not for the money we need...£18.4mil to break even based on his contract.

I think he will be loaned till summer then it drops to a more manageable £16mil

I mean, basically watch this and it will highlight just why you are wrong with your constant book prices.

 

[Frang]

Yes but a deal with Bestikas would be different Zat.

We still havent paid them all the fee.

They are never going to match his absurd wages and quite rightly tosun ain't gunna take a huge huge hit

We will be paying him, whether he with us or not for 4 more years

 

[Zatara]

Yes but a deal with Bestikas would be different Zat.

We still havent paid them all the fee.

So if i buy something from you at £23 and a year later offer it back to you and you offer £10 im still down.

Who would take him on loan though? I agree we should keep until the summer but I would use him as a sub when plan a doesn't work.

Problem is that hes not even good enough as a sub...the only reason to loan is so we dont lose as much on a transfer.

I mean, basically watch this and it will highlight just why you are wrong with your constant book prices.

Its nearly 4am...so thats unlikely.

They are never going to match his absurd wages and quite rightly tosun ain't gunna take a huge huge hit

We will be paying him, whether he with us or not for 4 more years

Unless Palace or someone desperate come in for him...they almost took niasse before.

 

[Goat]

So if i buy something from you at £23 and a year later offer it back to you and you offer £10 im still down.



Problem is that hes not even good enough as a sub...the only reason to loan is so we dont lose as much on a transfer.



Its nearly 4am...so thats unlikely.



Unless Palace or someone desperate come in for him...they almost took niasse before.

Just watch the vid please Zat, then I wont have to keep pulling you up.

 

[messymascot]

So if i buy something from you at £23 and a year later offer it back to you and you offer £10 im still down.



Problem is that hes not even good enough as a sub...the only reason to loan is so we dont lose as much on a transfer.



Its nearly 4am...so thats unlikely.



Unless Palace or someone desperate come in for him...they almost took niasse before.

He's not an awful player in my opinion just not suited to our current system. However when chasing games with 10-15 if we change system like any good manager is prepared to do i think he can contribute. Unfortunately that is not enough reason to keep ling long term as your substitute striker needs to be able to start games when 1st choice is unavailable or out of form.

 

[Zatara]

Just watch the vid please Zat, then I wont have to keep pulling you up.

Watched it, and it doesnt make sense

The rules for transfers separate wages and transfer fees. This video must have been made before the STCC amendments in 2016 ?

 

[Zatara]

He's not an awful player in my opinion just not suited to our current system. However when chasing games with 10-15 if we change system like any good manager is prepared to do i think he can contribute. Unfortunately that is not enough reason to keep ling long term as your substitute striker needs to be able to start games when 1st choice is unavailable or out of form.

I think we need to get rid of him and niasse + sign 1 first choice striker + have richarlison and dcl who can come in when needed.

 

[Goat]

Watched it, and it doesnt make sense

The rules for transfers separate wages and transfer fees. This video must have been made before the STCC amendments in 2016 ?

STCC covers WAGES only and is a Premier League only thing
FFP covers OVERALL cashflow of clubs and as that video explains, clubs use player amortisation to "fudge" the figures

Its all very complicated, which is why your average fan, like me and you, should stick to things we know about, which is NET spend.

 

[Toffeelover]

Remind me again what numbskull signed him?

 

[messymascot]

I think we need to get rid of him and niasse + sign 1 first choice striker + have richarlison and dcl who can come in when needed.

If we get rid they need to be permanent transfers as it will be more work to do in the summer and if they both have poor loans it will make things even more so.