dholliday
deconstructed rep
The whole thing. There are 16,000 comments. A quick perusal appears to reveal almost all comments mentioning the shady body language, and oddly-spoken mannerisms (of all 3 astronauts).That video goes for 1 hour and 23 minutes, which part are you referring to as odd? I'm at work so can't sit through the whole thing.
If you're referring to the answers given by the crew, only Mike Collins was considered warm, friendly, a great communicator etc. Armstrong was notoriously shy and only interested in the mission, he hated all the media circus and celebrity that went with the job. Aldrin was regarded by many of his peers as a very strange man indeed, arrogant, pushy, selfish were all things he was accused of being.
Personally I don't believe it was faked: I believe these men did go to the moon, and I believe your take on their personalities. It's just interesting to see how another opinion can form.
Well, you're saying you've studied it in depth, but anyone can say that. Of course I believe you, I see no reason not to. But you've not really contributed to the group understanding of that term within this thread. I've tried, it makes sense to me, but maybe it's nonsense to others. I tried, tho'.No I don't like it, that's the point. I've studied the subject in some depth and I don't like seeing it casually tossed around by people who haven't.
i think you'd struggle with those articles i linked
And you're accusing me of arrogance?
And again you're misunderstanding: you'd struggle with those articles because that's the word you used yourself when trying to understand my posts. You struggle because you don't like to see the term bandied about casually. I was merely demonstrating how often we see the term used/misused, i.e. defending my own use/misuse of it. How is that arrogant on my part? I'm merely mirroring what you yourself said. Here it is again:
to be honest I'm struggling to see your point.