Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
That video goes for 1 hour and 23 minutes, which part are you referring to as odd? I'm at work so can't sit through the whole thing.

If you're referring to the answers given by the crew, only Mike Collins was considered warm, friendly, a great communicator etc. Armstrong was notoriously shy and only interested in the mission, he hated all the media circus and celebrity that went with the job. Aldrin was regarded by many of his peers as a very strange man indeed, arrogant, pushy, selfish were all things he was accused of being.
The whole thing. There are 16,000 comments. A quick perusal appears to reveal almost all comments mentioning the shady body language, and oddly-spoken mannerisms (of all 3 astronauts).

Personally I don't believe it was faked: I believe these men did go to the moon, and I believe your take on their personalities. It's just interesting to see how another opinion can form.


No I don't like it, that's the point. I've studied the subject in some depth and I don't like seeing it casually tossed around by people who haven't.

i think you'd struggle with those articles i linked

And you're accusing me of arrogance?
Well, you're saying you've studied it in depth, but anyone can say that. Of course I believe you, I see no reason not to. But you've not really contributed to the group understanding of that term within this thread. I've tried, it makes sense to me, but maybe it's nonsense to others. I tried, tho'.

And again you're misunderstanding: you'd struggle with those articles because that's the word you used yourself when trying to understand my posts. You struggle because you don't like to see the term bandied about casually. I was merely demonstrating how often we see the term used/misused, i.e. defending my own use/misuse of it. How is that arrogant on my part? I'm merely mirroring what you yourself said. Here it is again:
to be honest I'm struggling to see your point.
 

Well, you're saying you've studied it in depth, but anyone can say that. Of course I believe you, I see no reason not to.

Hahaha, nice try - 'I'm not saying I don't believe you, I'm just saying....'


But you've not really contributed to the group understanding of that term within this thread. I've tried, it makes sense to me, but maybe it's nonsense to others. I tried, tho'.

I've provided a concise explanation of the theory, you've shifted the goalposts to 'well in the real world its used much more broadly'.


And again you're misunderstanding: you'd struggle with those articles because that's the word you used yourself when trying to understand my posts. You struggle because you don't like to see the term bandied about casually. I was merely demonstrating how often we see the term used/misused, i.e. defending my own use/misuse of it. How is that arrogant on my part? I'm merely mirroring what you yourself said. Here it is again:

Perhaps you should explain your assessments of other people's understanding more carefully then. It's not 'struggling to understand' to point out that the term is being used loosely, and incorrectly.

I'll leave it at that.
 
ISIS was over gas. A new gas line was to be built by The Iranians and Russians from Iran, through Syria to Turkey, to sell gas much cheaper to Europe.

ISIS were utilised to put a stop to this and they were funded but then went rogue...
I am confident the whole Syria conflagration is over that country's geographic importance with respect to to gas pipelines into Europe. It is why USA and Russia are there. ISIS?...yes I agree, like Al Queda, a force/entity created and funded by USA to cause problems for USA's (and Israel's of course...those two countries are one and the same with respect to Middle East geopolitics) opponents/competition.
The Deep State that runs the world is an avaricious, bellicose beast...no amount of blood can satisfy its urges.
I believe global population control (ie depopulation) is also prominently in its sights....COVID anybody?...or, perhaps more more saliently...COVID vaccine anyone?
 
I am confident the whole Syria conflagration is over that country's geographic importance with respect to to gas pipelines into Europe. It is why USA and Russia are there. ISIS?...yes I agree, like Al Queda, a force/entity created and funded by USA to cause problems for USA's (and Israel's of course...those two countries are one and the same with respect to Middle East geopolitics) opponents/competition.
The Deep State that runs the world is an avaricious, bellicose beast...no amount of blood can satisfy its urges.
I believe global population control (ie depopulation) is also prominently in its sights....COVID anybody?...or, perhaps more more saliently...COVID vaccine anyone?
Your first paragraph I agree with completely. The other 2?
There's a deep state that runs the world and wants to control population by using a Covid vaccine? It's currently 2am in NZ, so I will assume you are drunk :drunk:
 
Well, you're saying you've studied it in depth, but anyone can say that. Of course I believe you, I see no reason not to.

Hahaha, nice try - 'I'm not saying I don't believe you, I'm just saying....'
no, not at all. i believe you because i recognise your username and think i recall you being a sensible poster. it would be dead weird if you were just pretending to understand, so i discounted that.

i've provided a concise explanation of the theory, you've shifted the goalposts to 'well in the real world its used much more broadly'.
i didn't shift the goalposts, you did. i originally used it more broadly, you came in and shifted the use to meaning something very specific, something linguistically-inflexible (if technically more accurate).

Perhaps you should explain your assessments of other people's understanding more carefully then. It's not 'struggling to understand' to point out that the term is being used loosely, and incorrectly.
You are struggling, tho'. It took you three posts to finally state what your initial problem was, and you don't accept colloquial use of the term, hence you will struggle to understand people's meaning when they use it so.

Whereas other people, perhaps laymen, will contextually understand the point being made. Hence one coming across the term used that way so often...it works, linguistically at least.


The Deep State that runs the world is an avaricious, bellicose beast...no amount of blood can satisfy its urges.
I believe global population control (ie depopulation) is also prominently in its sights....COVID anybody?...or, perhaps more more saliently...COVID vaccine anyone?
do you enjoy a site with the letters G A in its name, ending with a domain opposite to a loss?
 

I am confident the whole Syria conflagration is over that country's geographic importance with respect to to gas pipelines into Europe. It is why USA and Russia are there. ISIS?...yes I agree, like Al Queda, a force/entity created and funded by USA to cause problems for USA's (and Israel's of course...those two countries are one and the same with respect to Middle East geopolitics) opponents/competition.
The Deep State that runs the world is an avaricious, bellicose beast...no amount of blood can satisfy its urges.
I believe global population control (ie depopulation) is also prominently in its sights....COVID anybody?...or, perhaps more more saliently...COVID vaccine anyone?
I was potentially going to start work in the Kurdistan region for said pipeline. Then ISIS problems kicked off and all the project was cancelled/delayed. That was 7-8 years a go or so... Would have been a great job!!
 
Your first paragraph I agree with completely. The other 2?
There's a deep state that runs the world and wants to control population by using a Covid vaccine? It's currently 2am in NZ, so I will assume you are drunk :drunk:
I do love to see people posting deep state conspiracies peddled out by the likes of Fox News when the owner of that station is arguably one of the most powerful men in the world. I wonder what him and his contemporaries would have to gain from public mistrust in governments. Thick as mince some people.
 
I do love to see people posting deep state conspiracies peddled out by the likes of Fox News when the owner of that station is arguably one of the most powerful men in the world. I wonder what him and his contemporaries would have to gain from public mistrust in governments. Thick as mince some people.
I think you are taking things in this thread a little too seriously mate...lighten up and smile a little
 



Zeitgeist 2007 aged incredibly well in regards to its coverage of Christianity, 9/11 & Banks. It's also available on Netflix if you prefer better quality than YT.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top