Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I remember thinking what a load of complete nonsense that is like.Remember when we came 7th with Lukaku and we still would of been 7th if he scored zero goals that season,
He scored 3 vs West Brom - 2 points lostRemember when we came 7th with Lukaku and we still would of been 7th if he scored zero goals that season, be interesting to note if you take away the DCL goals where we would be in the table.
He might of fizzeled out but i bet he accounts for a lot of our points this season
He scored 3 vs West Brom - 2 points lost
Palace - 2 points lost
Liverpool - 1 point lost
Fulham - 3 points lost
Burnley - 1 point lost
Leeds - 2 points lost
United - 1 point lost
12 points
We would be 12th on 40 points.
95% of his goals have given us points.
But he's not good enough, LOL.
Wow, so he did, how I missed that I don't know.Scored the header against Spurs at their place too.
I think it was Steve Walsh who piped up with that gem.I remember thinking what a load of complete nonsense that is like.
I think it was Steve Walsh who piped up with that gem.
Which, on paper, may be right. However even if a load of Lukaku's goals came when we were ahead already, goals kill off games. Dampen down the possibility of the comeback, boost team confidence when you get bigger winning margins etc.
Odd logic unless he's scoring the 7th in 7-0 wins. Which he wasn't.
Going a bit off topic I know, but I've said before that's actually been one of our big issues this season in my opinion. We've virtually (possibly literally) never been able to take our foot off the gas because a game's wrapped up. We have to play at full intensity for 90 minutes every game in order to get results, and I think that takes it's toll, causing injuries and fatigue, as well as obviously getting pegged back in some games and dropping points. That ability to put teams to the sword and turn an edgy game into a rout can be a lot more useful than people make out.Yep exactly this.
The logic is so flawed, we could win a game 4-0 Lukaku store a hatrick and then Barkley scores a last 4th on the counter, statistically speaking we didn't need lukakus goals to win the game.
Does that take into account Palace would have 2 more points? So we would be 13th and them 12th on 40 points ?Wow, so he did, how I missed that I don't know.
Spurs - 2 points lost
West Brom - 2 points lost
Palace - 2 points lost
Liverpool - 1 point lost
Fulham - 3 points lost
Burnley - 1 point lost
Leeds - 2 points lost
United - 1 point lost
14 points
We would be 12th on 38 points.
Yeah but factually it was correct based on nothing but mathsI remember thinking what a load of complete nonsense that is like.
Yep exactly this.
The logic is so flawed, we could win a game 4-0 Lukaku store a hatrick and then Barkley scores a last 4th on the counter, statistically speaking we didn't need lukakus goals to win the game.
We needs better midfield .......more like .....As much as he has improved, if we want to seriously challenge top 4 on a regular basis, we need a better first choice striker than Dom
No mate, I didn't look at the impact of other teams.Does that take into account Palace would have 2 more points? So we would be 13th and them 12th on 40 points ?
I’m not sure ‘factually’ is a word I’d use in relation to a ‘stat’ like that.Yeah but factually it was correct based on nothing but maths