Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

2024/25 Dominic Calvert-Lewin

When he's at his very very best he's a real threat in the air, but I'm not sure he's ever really showed a consistent ability in that regard. He's certainly never been anything like a Ferguson or Fellaini who you just assumed would win virtually every header. For me he's always just been a bit of workhorse type striker - a bit of pace, decent strength and aerial ability, will grab a few goals. For a little while it looked like he was going to bloom into something more than that, but in the main he's always been a bit like he is now (albeit when he was younger I would say he worked harder).
I'd say his best performances came against defenders he could bully and put under pressure with his physicality, similar to somebody like Antonio at West Ham.

Doesn't seem to have that in him these days, though.
 
We need new strikers. Have done for 5 years.
But here is a fine line thing between strikers sitting around the bottom of the table with us. Lets look at Mateta at palace. No great shakes as a striker. 6 goals. Scored last night in the win at leicester. His goals directly putting points on the board. Just that alone is the difference between sitting on 16/17 points and 23/24 like palace are. Calvert lewin is our main starter up top. 17 of the 20 games this season. Points gained through his goals? None.
Beto has put 1 point on the board directly through his goals. The draw against Fulham. And he didnt even start that game.
Calvert lewin is a better player technically than Beto but his contribution to points on the board this season is virtually nil. There's that little difference last night when he put the ball 6 feet over the bar. The little difference of your striker nicks you a point.
He hasnt got it in him.

Beto isn't the answer. There's a reason he doesn't play. Neither one is good enough, debating the merits of one over the other at this point is a bit silly.
 

When he's at his very very best he's a real threat in the air, but I'm not sure he's ever really showed a consistent ability in that regard. He's certainly never been anything like a Ferguson or Fellaini who you just assumed would win virtually every header. For me he's always just been a bit of workhorse type striker - a bit of pace, decent strength and aerial ability, will grab a few goals. For a little while it looked like he was going to bloom into something more than that, but in the main he's always been a bit like he is now (albeit when he was younger I would say he worked harder).
I'm not sure, for a couple of years he rose as high as anyone I've seen at Everton since Alex Young, his leap and ability to time it was very good.
 

He is 5th this season for big chances missed with 11. Which is quite remarkable given how few chances we actually create.


He also doesn't really ever score a half chance or make a goal for himself. So to have only 2 goals but 11 clear chances missed, is absolutely not good enough. And it also shows the service argument is not really true - for every goal scored, there are 5 or 6 big chances missed according to these statistics.

It was a big mistake not to let him leave last summer and to take whatever money we could get.
Doesn't score one on ones either
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top