Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC" part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
That bank loan from fsg was for the increased capacity it pays it self off, 15m added to rheir turnover per season
If you are calling that a debt, the we are in over 150m debt to moshiri, and Chelsea are in over 1bn in debt to abramovich.

"if"

Out of curiosity how would you describe it?
 
"if"

Out of curiosity how would you describe it?

It would be called debt in anyones estimation.

We do have an interest free loan from Moshiri, which will be converted to shares at some point. They pay interest on their loan to FSG which there has been no intention to convert.

They are paying back aspects of the debt (on the stand) but the figure is around 300 million all told. That's before the latest pay splurge of this summer comes.
 
"if"

Out of curiosity how would you describe it?

You can't tell what their debt is until their accounts are revelaed later on this year.

But the redevelopment of anfield will pay for itself, it may take a decade but as long as fans continue to go there not going to have a problem.
 

It would be called debt in anyones estimation.

We do have an interest free loan from Moshiri, which will be converted to shares at some point. They pay interest on their loan to FSG which there has been no intention to convert.

They are paying back aspects of the debt (on the stand) but the figure is around 300 million all told. That's before the latest pay splurge of this summer comes.

The loan has an interest payable of 1.3m a year. The increased capacity raked in 12 m last year and likely to be 15m this season due to cl. That's 27m


So they pay 2.6m interest over 2 years but get in an extra 24.4m. let's say they repay the loan at 5m per season. There still up over the last two years at 14.4m profit.
 
The loan has an interest payable of 1.3m a year. The increased capacity raked in 12 m last year and likely to be 15m this season due to cl. That's 27m


So they pay 2.6m interest over 2 years but get in an extra 24.4m. let's say they repay the loan at 5m per season. There still up over the last two years at 14.4m profit.
M8 ?
 
The loan has an interest payable of 1.3m a year. The increased capacity raked in 12 m last year and likely to be 15m this season due to cl. That's 27m


So they pay 2.6m interest over 2 years but get in an extra 24.4m. let's say they repay the loan at 5m per season. There still up over the last two years at 14.4m profit.

I covered that by stating that by stating they are paying down the debt which relates to the new stand.

I'd question your figures a little. They wanted to get an average of 37£ per seat per game (on a rough increase of 10k seats). They didn't hit that target due to the protests and re adjustments in prices which came. Accross a 20 game season it gives them increased revenue of 6 million per season. Being generous and calling it 30 homes games you are at 9 million additional. Enough to service the interest and pay some of the capital off (not sure that is happening currently) but certainly not the 15 million figure.
 
You can't tell what their debt is until their accounts are revelaed later on this year.

But the redevelopment of anfield will pay for itself, it may take a decade but as long as fans continue to go there not going to have a problem.

Nobody is saying the stand debt alone is a problem. And you are right, debt that relates to new stands/stadiums is normally very serviceable and not an issue.

What is a looming cloud though is the overall debt figure, which is around 300 million. It's why FSG are hesitant about the Anfield road end redevelopment ( I believe planning permission has now expired for that). They have also spent 100 million already this window so the short term liquidity/overdraft will likely be being stretched beyond the 70 million mark it was reported as in last years accounts. It may be further loans from FSG to over it, extending an overdraft/debt or selling big name players to cover it. In lieu of a sale it can be assumed the debt will continue to grow.

That is not a problem currently all the while they continue to make the champions league. However if they miss out one season, it would put pressure upon the club.

Nothing I've said here is inconsistent with your points.
 
The loan has an interest payable of 1.3m a year. The increased capacity raked in 12 m last year and likely to be 15m this season due to cl. That's 27m


So they pay 2.6m interest over 2 years but get in an extra 24.4m. let's say they repay the loan at 5m per season. There still up over the last two years at 14.4m profit.
How come you’re pretending to be an Everton fan pal? Bit creepy no?
 

I covered that by stating that by stating they are paying down the debt which relates to the new stand.

I'd question your figures a little. They wanted to get an average of 37£ per seat per game (on a rough increase of 10k seats). They didn't hit that target due to the protests and re adjustments in prices which came. Accross a 20 game season it gives them increased revenue of 6 million per season. Being generous and calling it 30 homes games you are at 9 million additional. Enough to service the interest and pay some of the capital off (not sure that is happening currently) but certainly not the 15 million figure.

It was 12m in its first season without cl football. so you would expect cl football to increase that to 15m.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www....ain-stand-earns-club-extra-12m-last-year/amp/
 
Nobody is saying the stand debt alone is a problem. And you are right, debt that relates to new stands/stadiums is normally very serviceable and not an issue.

What is a looming cloud though is the overall debt figure, which is around 300 million. It's why FSG are hesitant about the Anfield road end redevelopment ( I believe planning permission has now expired for that). They have also spent 100 million already this window so the short term liquidity/overdraft will likely be being stretched beyond the 70 million mark it was reported as in last years accounts. It may be further loans from FSG to over it, extending an overdraft/debt or selling big name players to cover it. In lieu of a sale it can be assumed the debt will continue to grow.

That is not a problem currently all the while they continue to make the champions league. However if they miss out one season, it would put pressure upon the club.

Nothing I've said here is inconsistent with your points.

Planning permission is to 2020 i think. The money for the stand was done by a loan from FSG interest free if memory serves me right.
 
Planning permission is to 2020 i think. The money for the stand was done by a loan from FSG interest free if memory serves me right.
It's not interest free it's what ever the American interest rate is.

I'm still not a Liverpool fan by the way
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top