4737carlin
Player Valuation: £90m
Thing is if the blow it, it could be even more spectacular then when they did it last time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No I don't think they did you know, I'd check that if I were you.That will put them ahead of United again. They did win it in 2014 and 2019 didn't they like so many cryarses on here told us they would.
Just had a glance and in 2013, City had peak Silva, Nasri and Navas in their team scoring and creating plenty. The last thing they needed was another attacking midfielder, they would never have signed Coutinho who, at the time was rotting at Inter Milan being managed by none other than, Rafael Benitez. And City didn't sign another one till 2 years later in 2015 when they signed Sterling and KDB.
Also, if City were scouting Van Dijk at Groningen in 2013, then fair play, that's impressive. But if they hadn't changed their scouting system passwords by 2018, 5 years after the settlement, I've little sympathy for them.
Respectfully, the jury disagreed.
Trademark?"We are back on our perch, as we famously say". Say again ?? Didnt someone else rather more famously say the original. The RS shouldnt attempt to paraphrase... or should that be parrot-phrase.
Trademark?
I hope that they have to pay costs and Big Joe can put it towards the new stadium facilitating infrastructure for the benefit of Liverpool.That's just been turned down today.
Claiming it was for everyone's best interests.
Shameless club.
A lot of local fans against it, their out of town army were all for itPlenty to have a go at that lot for, but most of their real fans were dead against the trademark thing.
They're having a lot off success on the field, but they're losing a lot off it.
A lot of local fans against it, their out of town army were all for it
A lot of local fans against it, their out of town army were all for it
Just sycophants, the same ones starting petitions to stop bramely moore even though it benefits the cityI don't understand why any of their fans would be for it?
Why would they want to pay £25 for a scarf from the club instead of £5 from a stall?
Just sycophants, the same ones starting petitions to stop bramely moore even though it benefits the city
I think that you might have missed my point.No I don't think they did you know, I'd check that if I were you.
Did they at least get to trade mark "Satan's Horde FC"?Liverpool FC fail in move to trademark the word ‘Liverpool’
Liverpool FC’s attempt to trademark the word ‘Liverpool’ has been rejected by the government’s Intellectual Property Office due to the ‘geographical significance’ of the citywww.theguardian.com