So they lost £50m on £200m turnover. Hard to see how financial fair play can't be all over that. Unless it's a completely toothless sham of course.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Worth remembering here that FFP excludes money spent on infrastructure, training facilities, youth development and tax.
http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/Tech/uefaorg/General/01/80/54/10/1805410_DOWNLOAD.pdf
So for any club to fall foul of them they have to be pretty messed up.
The reason why they aren't paying suarez more until next season is simple....
If they don't make champions league he will be sold and paid that at another club. Therefore he gets them in the champs league and as a reward gets rewarded with a champions league wage.
So we suddenly look like winning the league and the press start the downbeat Liverpool FC stories? There's a surprise ...
Can't get my head around RAWK's analysis. From the ignorant to the 'optimistic' to the deluded.
Third set of results with a £50m loss and they're jumping around like all their Christmases have come at once.
My favourite is probably the belief that FSG writing off the 'external' debt is some sort of gift. Why are they so 'different'?
I don't think the results are great. But one interpretation could be, debt has remained stable, despite spending a f**kton more on transfers again and they have a nice fat increase in tv income to come, plus potential champions league money and increased sponsorship. It's not a great picture but it's not as bad as a headline 50 million loss. As with most accounts these are now desperately out of date. Not sure they tell us anything new other than that have been spending beyond their means.
I don't think the results are great. But one interpretation could be, debt has remained stable, despite spending a f**kton more on transfers again and they have a nice fat increase in tv income to come, plus potential champions league money and increased sponsorship. It's not a great picture but it's not as bad as a headline 50 million loss. As with most accounts these are now desperately out of date. Not sure they tell us anything new other than that have been spending beyond their means.
TBF there are worse offenders than the RS
City/PSG must be a worse example surely