With all respect, what needs to be separated is the incident itself and the cover-up afterwards. The disaster was caused by one man making one decision to try and solve a problem outside the ground, though because he wasnt familiar with the ground, didnt identify what might the end result of that decision might be, didnt recognize how decrepit and fundamentally unsafe the ground as it then was, it is very questionable whether he should be held criminally responsible for the deaths that resulted from that decision.
Of course, the cover-up that followed immediately on from the disaster probably did take the form of some kind of criminal offence, and those responsible for that should face justice.
I can't make out if you're actually defending his actions because of other mitigating circumstances; are you seriously saying that a man who has overall responsibility for the safety of every person is not criminally responsible for a decision he made?
Of course he his, its why hes in that position of power. This is exactly why the justice campaign is still going and will carry on: one of maggies top boys cant be held responsible for the deaths of working class people, it was all there fault, they stunk of ale, robbed from there own, pissed on the dead and fought with people coppers trying to help.
Get it?
And how many of the victims families got a payout from the government for traumatic stress etc?? But compare that to that coppers, a nice payout from the coffers; it was obviously more traumatic being a copper that day then a fan seeing your son, dad, brother, sister or friend slowly suffocate to death next to you