Red End
Player Valuation: Free Transfer
Well that`s not very nice from ye blue brethren Ernie.Blue mate
But because I said Liverpool are a good side at present i'm obviously a kopite
Get your blue bollocks out and slap them about.
Well that`s not very nice from ye blue brethren Ernie.Blue mate
But because I said Liverpool are a good side at present i'm obviously a kopite
Well that`s not very nice from ye blue brethren Ernie.
Get your blue bollocks out and slap them about.
I wouldn`t be so sure, we`re playing well at the moment but Koeman will have you tight and compact for the Derby which is when we tend to struggle against teams.
Well that`s not very nice from ye blue brethren Ernie.
Get your blue bollocks out and slap them about.
he assembled a side capable of getting stuffed 6-1 at Stoke.
lol Almost forgot about that
Ah the joys of Monday morning..... explaining to the rs at work they are 3rd not joint top....
A post on Koeman from Rawk, feel free to respond, I will come back later.
Quote from: DonkeyWan on Yesterday at 12:35:24 PM
Lets have a potted history of Keoman as manager shall we? He takes over at Ajax in 2001. Lets not under value this, he did well to get a double in his first year. The second year wasn't so good, he does regain the title the following year, but by 2005 his team is struggling so he jumps before he is pushed.
He takes over at Benfica where, after some initial success, his team begin to struggle (notice a pattern here?) He does the sum of [Poor language removed] all and leaves at the end of the season for Dutch football once more.
Now, I should pause here for a moment and point something out. There are three big teams in Holland, Ajax, PSV and Feyenoord. If you were to compar them tot hree PL sides I would say Liverpool, Man United and Arsenal are the best fit (three storied clubs with a long history of success rather than newly monied flash in the pans froma historical perspective). Imagine if you will a manager of Liverpool who, after winning a trophy or two, left under a cloud only to come back the following year to manage United. Cos that's what Koeman did.
He comes back to manage PSV, takes over a successful team and then, after an initial burst, flags badly in the first season before recovering just enough to get ove rthe line...by goal difference. A single goal at that. In a league that PSV had won the two previous seasons by 10 points. It will not surprise you to hear that Koeman [Poor language removed] off the following year to a reasonably big side in Valencia...
... where he did, in fairness, win a cup, but left the team in 15th, did spectacularly [Poor language removed] in Europe and got sacked.
He now rushes back to Dutch football and takes over at AZ, themselves a pretty decent sized club, lets say the Spurs of the Dutch league, some past success but not a lot and not for a while. Here he starts spectacularly badly and gets fired.
From there he goes to Feyenoord. The last of the big three. Lets compare them to Arsenal as their rivalry isn't as intense as that of PSV and Ajax (who I would compare to Liverpool and United). He does nothing at Feyenoord and leaves after 3 seasons, a real nothing tenure.
He then washes up at the Southampton side, itself a success story but not operating at the highest level in the league. Two seasons later and he jumps ship to Everton. This is a strnage move by any measure.
So, what have we learned from Koeman's managerial history?
1] He doesn't stay long at any club. His longest stint was his first one at a club he was a legend as a player for.
2] After initial success his teams quickly deteriorate in quality.
3] He has no issue job hopping from rival to rival. Imagine if Brendan Rodgers came back from Celtic at the end of the season to manage United... and from there went to Arsenal. Imagine how much you would hate that as a fan.
4] Koeman does not build success, he inherits it. That's the biggest criticism for me. That is consistent throughout his managerial career.
5] As soons as the heat is applied he is off. Not one to ride out the slings and arrows of misfortune, Koeman is a manager quite happy to go if the going is good.
Now, apply what we know of Koeman to Everton's position. A team that needs stability, investment and a manager that can build a team in his own image and create a winning formula. That's the success Moyes brought the side. Theya re still effectively living off that. Does Koeman strike you as the right man for that job? Me either. He's not a young coach either, he is 53 and nothing in his career to date suggests he could, at this late stage, start buildinga side from scratch for the future."
A post on Koeman from Rawk, feel free to respond, I will come back later.
Quote from: DonkeyWan on Yesterday at 12:35:24 PM
Lets have a potted history of Keoman as manager shall we? He takes over at Ajax in 2001. Lets not under value this, he did well to get a double in his first year. The second year wasn't so good, he does regain the title the following year, but by 2005 his team is struggling so he jumps before he is pushed.
He takes over at Benfica where, after some initial success, his team begin to struggle (notice a pattern here?) He does the sum of [Poor language removed] all and leaves at the end of the season for Dutch football once more.
Now, I should pause here for a moment and point something out. There are three big teams in Holland, Ajax, PSV and Feyenoord. If you were to compar them tot hree PL sides I would say Liverpool, Man United and Arsenal are the best fit (three storied clubs with a long history of success rather than newly monied flash in the pans froma historical perspective). Imagine if you will a manager of Liverpool who, after winning a trophy or two, left under a cloud only to come back the following year to manage United. Cos that's what Koeman did.
He comes back to manage PSV, takes over a successful team and then, after an initial burst, flags badly in the first season before recovering just enough to get ove rthe line...by goal difference. A single goal at that. In a league that PSV had won the two previous seasons by 10 points. It will not surprise you to hear that Koeman [Poor language removed] off the following year to a reasonably big side in Valencia...
... where he did, in fairness, win a cup, but left the team in 15th, did spectacularly [Poor language removed] in Europe and got sacked.
He now rushes back to Dutch football and takes over at AZ, themselves a pretty decent sized club, lets say the Spurs of the Dutch league, some past success but not a lot and not for a while. Here he starts spectacularly badly and gets fired.
From there he goes to Feyenoord. The last of the big three. Lets compare them to Arsenal as their rivalry isn't as intense as that of PSV and Ajax (who I would compare to Liverpool and United). He does nothing at Feyenoord and leaves after 3 seasons, a real nothing tenure.
He then washes up at the Southampton side, itself a success story but not operating at the highest level in the league. Two seasons later and he jumps ship to Everton. This is a strnage move by any measure.
So, what have we learned from Koeman's managerial history?
1] He doesn't stay long at any club. His longest stint was his first one at a club he was a legend as a player for.
2] After initial success his teams quickly deteriorate in quality.
3] He has no issue job hopping from rival to rival. Imagine if Brendan Rodgers came back from Celtic at the end of the season to manage United... and from there went to Arsenal. Imagine how much you would hate that as a fan.
4] Koeman does not build success, he inherits it. That's the biggest criticism for me. That is consistent throughout his managerial career.
5] As soons as the heat is applied he is off. Not one to ride out the slings and arrows of misfortune, Koeman is a manager quite happy to go if the going is good.
Now, apply what we know of Koeman to Everton's position. A team that needs stability, investment and a manager that can build a team in his own image and create a winning formula. That's the success Moyes brought the side. Theya re still effectively living off that. Does Koeman strike you as the right man for that job? Me either. He's not a young coach either, he is 53 and nothing in his career to date suggests he could, at this late stage, start buildinga side from scratch for the future."
As said above, Klopp has got this PL in his blood now. He's seen what I'd hoped Koeman would see: if you set up to win all three points handsomely you get your rewards.
The way they play is the way we should be playing, not the dire 9 players behind the ball nonsense.
They'll get top four no problem. Anyone who still thinks they won't are kidding themselves.