We would all take a very poor Lukaku though.No first touch. No engine. Fits and starts striker. Won,t make it in the Prem. Harsh words but true. Stature, presence of a very poor Lukaku.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We would all take a very poor Lukaku though.No first touch. No engine. Fits and starts striker. Won,t make it in the Prem. Harsh words but true. Stature, presence of a very poor Lukaku.
Funny you mention Haaland, as these two players come under the same banner in a way. Haaland was looked at earlier in his career and deemed like he'd already hit his heights as a kid and basically had no room to progress where as the lads around him would catch up so had more room to progress. Obviously Haaland proved that theory wrong in his case.He makes stuff happen all the time. He's incredible.
Although I'm not asking Simms to play like Haaland! I just think hes more effective as a sub.
I felt for Ellis Simms today, a little bit of composure in front of goal and things could have been completely different.
well, yes, but composure in front of goal is his job, so if he can't consistently deliver that, he can't be a striker. His form on that shot attempt was terrible. He scuffed it badly. Of course no player succeeds every time. Composure and quality in abundance for his Chelsea goal, so he is capable.
What bothers me a bit more is not seeing much evidence of other things that help the team. He recorded no tackles, no interceptions. A big reason why Utd were able to launch those long-ball attacks so quickly imo was that Simms was letting those defenders have lots of time on the ball. There might not be a better forward in the league than Richarlison at harrassing and hounding for the ball. Dominic Calvert-Lewin is pretty good at it. Gray will never be mistaken for Richy but you can't be as passive as Simms was, he was just kind of jogging around when he didn't have the ball.
With Doucoure out and only two in the middle the fowards had to provide a bit more as the first line of defense I think. With Simms being passive, and Bruno lying deeper, it was all too easy for Utd to be one touch, one pass, and away to the races.
CadamarteriI'm not sure Simms is a Richarlison. He's more of a Dominic Calvert-Lewin.
Far more of what exactly ?Does far more than Gray or Maupay so I'd play him but it would be better bringing off the bench but Dominic Calvert-Lewin is AWOL so needs must
Another crap decision by BillThe forgotten man at Everton, watching Sunderland here, its really sly we bought him back only to give him 216 minutes.
He got 1133 minutes at Sunderland and scored 7 in 17, us bring him back could cost them promotion, which isn't our problem, but we should have used him a lot more.
Well not really, it was a good decision, not playing him is the bad one, unless you think Maupay is better option.Another crap decision by Bill
Yeah, to be rewarded with the bench.I still can’t comprehend how he turned that defender for the Chelsea goal. The science said it was impossible