Everton Agree Fee With Man Utd For Lukaku

[Tramps_mate]

Anyone suggested it's £75 mil as Rooney was 'on a free'??

 

[Tramps_mate]

Anyone suggested it's £75 mil as Rooney was 'on a free'??

 

[mutley]

Rather £75 million now than £90 million on deadline day tbh.

Is it stressing you out ?

 

[gorgeousgeorgeEFC]

And to undersell the biggest asset in our history, when we don't need to is wrong.

Absolutely.

We made the same mistake with Rroney.

 

[Toffeeslam]

Last time I checked Everton have said there is no agreement, so why are sky and BBC saying a fee has been agreed ?

 

[Markydys]

Lost track with this - are we holding out for more?

 

[Ascro]

What surprises me about this whole suggestion of a supposed world record fee is that the only interest is from England. No interest from Spain, no interest from Italy or Germany, no PSG, no Chinese clubs.

£75m is a near 200% profit, take it, run, reinvest, and get guys who want to be here here....

 

[royalblue66]

United have form, they announced the Ramsay deal from Cardiff to all their pet journos years back who all ran with it, he signed for arsenal shortly after

Last time I checked Everton have said there is no agreement, so why are sky and BBC saying a fee has been agreed ?

Last time I checked Everton have said there is no agreement, so why are sky and BBC saying a fee has been agreed ?

And why no comment from Manure ?

 

[kev]

[/QUOTE It doesn't make sense to sell him for anything less. EFC don't want to sell him but have a verbal agreement that Lukaku can go if their valuation is met. Their valuation is £100mill. Until that is on the table he is going nowhere. Think of it like a release clause.

Would be ludicrous to let him go for less than £100million. What does £75million get you these days? 3 Bolasies.[/QUOTE]

1 X Romelu Lukaku

 

[Ascro]

Absolutely.

We made the same mistake with Rroney.

Did we undersell with Rooney? The market wasnt as crazy then as it is now.

 

[roydo]

So if this is United playing sneaky snides in pushing a transfer through - How is this any different to what Liverpool did with Van Dijk?

Surely it's far more insidious and illegal even than that?!

Fair point.

Have no idea. But other than Rom playing House with Pogba in LA, there actually isnt any evidence that he has spoken to a United representative.

He obviously has mind.

 

[d34noj]

What surprises me about this whole suggestion of a supposed world record fee is that the only interest is from England. No interest from Spain, no interest from Italy or Germany, no PSG, no Chinese clubs.

£75m is a near 200% profit, take it, run, reinvest, and get guys who want to be here here....

See where you're coming from mate, but no. Hold out for more - actual goalscorers are like unicorns teeth, not a penny under £100m or he stays IMO.

 

[Pittsburgh Footy]

People moaning about selling when we don't need to, but to what end? At some point we absolutely WILL need to sell so he doesn't leave on a free. Rom has all but confirmed he doesn't want to be here any longer, so why hold him here when we can sell for a good price and reinvest in the squad early, rather than in August? We don't need to sell him at a low-ball fee, but we certainly should sell him if we get a good fee for him, which £75m is. End of

 

[Woolly Blue]

If we sell Rom for 75 million, having been happy for the media, via Jim White, to report that the asking price was 100 million, then I'd be disappointed. No sensible person would expect us to get our asking price, but a price of 80 million plus is what I would have classed as decent business.

Granted, it's "only" five million difference, but, if it happens at that price, it's not the best bit of business we've ever done.

 

[summerisle]

Girds loins to read 86 pages.